On High-Dimensional Covariate Adjustment for Estimating Causal Effects in Randomized Trials with Survival Outcomes

被引:0
作者
Ran Dai
Cheng Zheng
Mei-Jie Zhang
机构
[1] University of Nebraska Medical Center,Department of Biostatistics
[2] Medical College of Wisconsin,Division of Biostatistics
来源
Statistics in Biosciences | 2023年 / 15卷
关键词
Survival analysis; High-dimensional data; Causal inference; Clinical trials; Random forest;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this work is to improve the efficiency in estimating the average causal effect (ACE) on the survival scale where right censoring exists and high-dimensional covariate information is available. We propose new estimators using regularized survival regression and survival Random Forest (RF) to adjust for the high-dimensional covariate to improve efficiency. We study the behavior of the adjusted estimators under mild assumptions and show theoretical guarantees that the proposed estimators are more efficient than the unadjusted ones asymptotically when using RF for the adjustment. In addition, these adjusted estimators are n\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\sqrt{n}$$\end{document}- consistent and asymptotically normally distributed. The finite sample behavior of our methods is studied by simulation. The simulation results are in agreement with the theoretical results. We also illustrate our methods by analyzing the real data from transplant research to identify the relative effectiveness of identical sibling donors compared to unrelated donors with the adjustment of cytogenetic abnormalities.
引用
收藏
页码:242 / 260
页数:18
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Bai X(2013)Doubly-robust estimators of treatment-specific survival distributions in observational studies with stratified sampling Biometrics 69 830-839
[2]  
Tsiatis A(2014)Inference on treatment effects after selection among high-dimensional controls Rev Econ Stud 81 608-650
[3]  
O’Brien S(2016)Lasso adjustments of treatment effect estimates in randomized experiments Proc Nat Acad Sci 113 7383-7390
[4]  
Belloni A(1981)A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial Controll Clin Trials 2 31-49
[5]  
Chernozhukov V(2001)Causal inference on the difference of the restricted mean life between two groups Biometrics 57 1030-1038
[6]  
Hansen C(2009)The consistency statement in causal inference: a definition or an assumption Epidemiology 20 3-5
[7]  
Bloniarz A(2004)Adjusted survival curves with inverse probability weights Comput Methods Programs Biomed 75 45-49
[8]  
Liu H(1972)Regression models and life-tables (with discussion) J R Stat Soc Ser B 34 187-202
[9]  
Zhang C-H(1989)Uniform consistency of the kernel conditional Kaplan–Meier estimate Ann Stat 17 1157-1167
[10]  
Sekhon J(1981)The jackknife estimate of variance Ann Stat 9 586-596