State of the ART: Assisted Reproductive Technologies in the United States

被引:0
|
作者
Mark D. Hornstein
机构
[1] Brigham and Women’s Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
来源
Reproductive Sciences | 2016年 / 23卷
关键词
IVF; assisted reproductive technologies; SART; ASRM;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This review provides a brief look at the state of the assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) in the United States in 2016. In 2013, the most recent year for which data are available through the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), there were 190 773 total cycles of ART. Live births ranged from 40.1 % per cycle initiated in women younger than 35 years to 4.5% live births per cycle initiated in women older than 42 years. US clinics must report their outcomes to the CDC. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology clinics must report through the SART, which maintains rigorous quality assurance and validation programs. Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology member clinics must abide by minimum standards set by the SART and the ASRM, which include educational and other requirements for professionals participating in in vitro fertilization programs as well as standards for the laboratories. Assisted reproductive technology in the United States is a highly regulated field on a voluntary basis with excellent clinical results.
引用
收藏
页码:1630 / 1633
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register
    Gunby, Joanne
    Daya, Salim
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2006, 86 (05) : 1356 - 1364
  • [22] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2007 results from the Canadian ART Register
    Gunby, Joanne
    Bissonnette, Francois
    Librach, Clifford
    Cowan, Lisa
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2011, 95 (02) : 542 - 547
  • [23] Assisted reproductive technologies
    Brunet, Laurence
    MEDECINE & DROIT, 2018, (148): : 5 - 9
  • [24] Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2004 results from the Canadian ART Register
    Gunby, Joanne
    Bissonnette, Francois
    Librach, Clifford
    Cowan, Lisa
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (05) : 1123 - 1132
  • [25] Epidemiology of critical states during pregnancy after assisted reproductive technologies
    Bashmakova, N. V.
    Davydenko, N. B.
    Malgina, G. B.
    Putilova, N. V.
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2016, 32 : 47 - 51
  • [26] Assisted reproductive technologies in Africa: The African Network and Registry for ART, 2018 and 2019
    Archary, Paversan
    Potgieter, Liezel
    Elgindy, Eman
    Adageba, Rudolph Kantum
    Mboloko, Justin
    Iketubosin, Faye
    Serour, Gamal
    Dyer, Silke
    REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE, 2023, 46 (05) : 835 - 845
  • [27] Assisted reproductive technologies in India
    Mukherjee M.
    Nadimipally S.B.
    Development, 2006, 49 (4) : 128 - 134
  • [28] Assisted reproductive technologies place
    Amar-Hoffet, A.
    Hedon, B.
    Belaisch-Allart, J.
    JOURNAL DE GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE ET BIOLOGIE DE LA REPRODUCTION, 2010, 39 (08): : S88 - S99
  • [29] The ART of communication: results from an international needs assessment in assisted reproductive technologies
    Murray, S.
    Awartani, K.
    Peloquin, S.
    Hayes, S. M.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2015, 30 : 348 - 348
  • [30] Reproductive tract microbiome in assisted reproductive technologies
    Franasiak, Jason M.
    Scott, Richard T., Jr.
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2015, 104 (06) : 1364 - 1371