Involvement of executive control in neural capacity related to working memory in aging: an ERP P300 study

被引:0
作者
Lina Guerrero
Badiâa Bouazzaoui
Michel Isingrini
Lucie Angel
机构
[1] Nantes Université,Laboratoire de psychologie des Pays de la Loire, LPPL, UR 4638
[2] Université d’Angers,UMR CNRS 7295, Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l’Apprentissage (CeRCA)
[3] Université de Tours,undefined
[4] Université de Poitiers,undefined
来源
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience | 2022年 / 22卷
关键词
Working memory; Executive control; ERP; P300; Neural capacity;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Executive control could be involved in neural capacity, which corresponds to the modulation of neural activity with increased task difficulty. Thus, by exploring the P300—an electrophysiological correlate of working memory—we examined the role played by executive control in both the age-related decline in working memory and neural capacity in aging. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded while younger and older participants performed a Sternberg task with two set sizes (2 vs. 6 items), allowing us to calculate a neural capacity index. Participants also completed two control tasks (Stroop and 3-back tests), which were used to calculate a composite executive control index. Results indicated that working memory performance decreased with aging and difficulty. At the neural level, results indicated that the P300 amplitude varied with aging and also with task difficulty. In the low difficulty condition, frontal P300 amplitude was higher for older than for younger adults, whereas in the high difficulty condition, the amplitude of frontal and parietal P300 did not differ between both age groups. Results also suggest that task difficulty led to a decrease in parietal amplitude in both age groups and to an increase in frontal amplitude in younger but not older adults. Both executive control and frontal neural capacity mediated the age-related variance in working memory for older adults. Moreover, executive control mediated the age-related variance in the frontal neural capacity of older adults. Thus, the present study suggests a model for older adults in which executive control deficits with advancing age lead to less efficient frontal recruitment to cope with task difficulty (neural capacity), which in turn has a negative impact on working memory functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:1311 / 1333
页数:22
相关论文
共 422 条
  • [1] Angel L(2016)Neural correlates of successful memory retrieval in aging: Do executive functioning and task difficulty matter? Brain Research 1631 53-71
  • [2] Bastin C(2011)Two hemispheres for better memory in old age : Role of executive functioning Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 23 3767-3777
  • [3] Genon S(1990)Effects of increased processing demands on age differences in working memory Psychology and Aging 5 421-428
  • [4] Salmon E(2003)Working memory: Looking back and looking forward Nature Reviews Neuroscience 4 829-839
  • [5] Fay S(2013)Efficiency, capacity, compensation, maintenance, plasticity: Emerging concepts in cognitive reserve Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17 502-509
  • [6] Balteau E(2011)Aging and switching the focus of attention in working memory: Age differences in item availability but not in item accessibility The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 66B 519-526
  • [7] Maquet P(2005)Aging and verbal memory span: A meta-analysis The Journals of Gerontology. Series B, Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences 60 P223-P233
  • [8] Luxen A(2014)Does the greater involvement of executive control in memory with age act as a compensatory mechanism? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology = Revue Canadienne De Psychologie Experimentale 68 59-66
  • [9] Isingrini M(2013)Differential involvement of knowledge representation and executive control in episodic memory performance in young and older adults Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale 67 100-107
  • [10] Collette F(2002)A theory of cognitive control, aging cognition, and neuromodulation Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 26 809-817