What should be done with a dilated bile duct?

被引:34
作者
Holm A.N. [1 ]
Gerke H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa, IA 52242
关键词
Bile duct; Bile duct disease; Biliary dilatation; ERCP; EUS; MRCP; Obstruction;
D O I
10.1007/s11894-010-0094-3
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Current methods for imaging the biliary tree include ultrasound, CT, MRI, endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). Bile duct abnormalities may be identified during evaluation of patient symptoms or laboratory abnormalities, or incidentally during imaging for another problem. Biliary dilatation, when identified, may be separated into obstructive or nonobstructive causes. Clinical presentation should guide decisions on which, if any, additional investigations are necessary. Choledocholithiasis is the most common cause of obstructive dilatation and frequently requires decompression. Nonobstructive causes include cystic dilatation, aging, and possibly post-cholecystectomy state. Data are limited regarding the yield of further investigations in patients with incidentally identified modest ductal dilatation without symptoms or laboratory abnormalities. Additional investigations are more likely to identify clinically relevant findings in patients with more pronounced dilatation. EUS is highly accurate, low-invasive, and useful in this setting, whereas ERC should be reserved for cases likely to require therapeutic intervention. © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 156
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Mahour G.H., Wakim K.G., Ferris D.O., The common bile duct in man: Its diameter and circumference, Ann Surg, 165, pp. 415-419, (1966)
  • [2] Adler D.G., Baron T.H., Davila R.E., Et al., ASGE guideline: The role of ERCP in diseases of the biliary tract and pancreas, Gastrointest Endosc, 62, pp. 1-8, (2005)
  • [3] Niederau C., Sonnenberg A., Mueller J., Comparison of the extrahepatic bile duct size measured by ultrasound and by different radiographic methods, Gastroenterology, 87, pp. 615-621, (1984)
  • [4] Stockberger S.M., Wass J.L., Sherman S., Et al., Intravenous cholangiography with helical CT: Comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography, Radiology, 192, pp. 675-680, (1994)
  • [5] Chung S.C., Leung J.W., Li A.K., Bile duct size after cholecystectomy: An endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatographic study, Br J Surg, 77, pp. 534-535, (1990)
  • [6] Neoptolemos J.P., Carr-Locke D.L., Kelly K.A., Factors affecting the diameters of the common bile duct and pancreatic duct using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, Hepatogastroenterology, 38, pp. 243-247, (1991)
  • [7] Dey J., Modeling and Analysis of Ultrasound Propagation in Layered Medium [Doctoral Dissertation], (1999)
  • [8] Cooperberg P.L., High-resolution real-time ultrasound in the evaluation of the normal and obstructed biliary tract, Radiology, 129, pp. 477-480, (1978)
  • [9] Parulekar S.G., Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size, Radiology, 133, pp. 703-707, (1979)
  • [10] Bruneton J.N., Roux P., Fenart D., Et al., Ultrasound evaluation of common bile duct size in normal adult patients and following cholecystectomy, a report of 750 cases, Eur J Radiol, 1, pp. 171-172, (1981)