Male-biased brood sex ratio depresses average phenotypic quality of barn swallow nestlings under experimentally harsh conditions

被引:0
作者
Nicola Saino
Rosa Mary de Ayala
Roberta Martinelli
Giuseppe Boncoraglio
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Milano,Dipartimento di Biologia
[2] Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas,Estación Experimental de Zonas Áridas
[3] Department of Biology,Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis (CEES)
[4] University of Oslo,undefined
来源
Oecologia | 2008年 / 156卷
关键词
Body size; Brood size; Growth; Immunity; Sex; Sex allocation; Sex ratio;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sex allocation strategies are believed to evolve in response to variation in fitness costs and benefits arising from the production of either sex and can be influenced by the differential susceptibility of sons and daughters to environmental conditions. We tested the effects of manipulating brood size and the sex ratio of the nestmates and the effect of sex on the phenotypic quality of individual barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) nestlings. Brood enlargement, which results in harsh rearing conditions, negatively affected the morphology and immunity of the nestlings. However, the negative consequences of brood enlargement were more marked among male than female offspring. In enlarged but not reduced broods, high proportions of male nestmates resulted in lowered individual body mass, body condition and feather growth. Thus, the consequences of a harsh environment on individual nestlings differed between the sexes and depended on the sex ratio among the other nestlings in the brood. The evolution of sex allocation strategies may therefore depend on the sex of individual nestlings but also on an interaction between environment and progeny sex ratio.
引用
收藏
页码:441 / 453
页数:12
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]  
Alatalo RV(1986)Heritability and selection on tarsus length in the pied flycatcher ( Evolution 40 474-483
[2]  
Lundberg A(2002)) Trends Ecol Evol 17 369-378
[3]  
Badyaev AV(1986)Growing apart: an ontogenetic perspective on the evolution of sexual size dimorphism Am Nat 127 495-507
[4]  
Bortolotti GR(2003)Influence of sibling competition on nestling sex ratios of sexually dimorphic birds Oecologia 137 140-147
[5]  
Brommer JE(2006)Ural owl sex allocation and parental investment under poor food conditions Proc R Soc Lond B 273 3129-3130
[6]  
Karell P(2006)Revised evidence for facultative sex ratio adjustment in birds: a correction Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60 619-630
[7]  
Pihlaja T(2004)Vitamin E supplementation enhances growth and condition of nestling barn swallows ( Proc R Soc Lond B 271 1277-1282
[8]  
Painter JN(2006)) J Evol Biol 19 981-993
[9]  
Primmer CR(1995)Facultative primary sex ratio variation: a lack of evidence in birds? Am Nat 146 1-24
[10]  
Pietiäinen H(1995)Differential effects of egg albumen content on barn swallow nestlings in relation to hatch order Nature 376 133-138