The Interplay of Cognitive Load, Learners' Resources and Self-regulation

被引:15
作者
Seufert, Tina [1 ]
Hamm, Verena [1 ]
Vogt, Andrea [1 ]
Riemer, Valentin [1 ]
机构
[1] Ulm Univ, Inst Psychol & Educ, Fac Engn Comp Sci & Psychol, Dept Learning & Instruct, Albert Einstein Allee 47, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
关键词
Self-regulated learning; Task difficulty; Learners' resources; Cognitive load; GOAL ORIENTATION; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; CUE-UTILIZATION; MOTIVATION; ACHIEVEMENT; PERFORMANCE; METACOGNITION; CLASSROOM; EMOTIONS; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s10648-024-09890-1
中图分类号
G44 [教育心理学];
学科分类号
0402 ; 040202 ;
摘要
Self-regulated learning depends on task difficulty and on learners' resources and cognitive load, as described by an inverted U-shaped relationship in Seufert's (2018) model: for easy tasks, resources are high and load is low, so there is no need to regulate, whereas for difficult tasks, load is too high and resources are too low to regulate. Only at moderate task difficulty do learners regulate, as resources and load are in equilibrium. The purpose of this study is to validate this model, i.e., the inverted U-shaped relationship between task difficulty and self-regulatory activities, as well as learner resources and cognitive load as mediators. In the within-subject study, 67 participants reported their cognitive and metacognitive strategy use for four exams of varying difficulty. For each exam task difficulty, cognitive load, and available resources (such as prior knowledge, interest, etc.) were assessed. Multilevel analysis revealed an inverted U-shaped relationship between task difficulty and the use of cognitive strategies. For metacognitive strategies, only a linear relationship was found. Increasing cognitive load mediated these relationship patterns. For learner resources we found a competitive mediation, indicating that further mediators could be relevant. In future investigations a broader range of task difficulty should be examined.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]   Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample [J].
Abar, Beau ;
Loken, Eric .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2010, 20 (01) :25-29
[2]   CLASSROOMS - GOALS, STRUCTURES, AND STUDENT MOTIVATION [J].
AMES, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 84 (03) :261-271
[3]   How predictive are self-reported strategies for their actual use? [J].
Artelt, C .
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PADAGOGISCHE PSYCHOLOGIE, 2000, 14 (2-3) :72-84
[4]   MOTIVATIONAL DETERMINANTS OF RISK-TAKING BEHAVIOR [J].
ATKINSON, JW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1957, 64 (06) :359-372
[5]   Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Winters, Fielding I. ;
Crornley, Jennifer G. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (01) :45-72
[6]  
Baker L., 1984, HDB READING RES, P353
[7]  
Bandura A., 1995, SELF EFFICACY CHANGI, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511527692
[8]   Short- and long-term effects of students' self-directed metacognitive prompts on navigation behavior and learning performance [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Sonnenberg, Christoph ;
Mengelkamp, Christoph ;
Pieger, Elisabeth .
COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2015, 52 :293-306
[9]   Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. Does the verbalisation method affect learning? [J].
Bannert, Maria ;
Mengelkamp, Christoph .
METACOGNITION AND LEARNING, 2008, 3 (01) :39-58
[10]   Goal-directed behavior and contextual factors in the classroom: An innovative approach to the study of multiple goals [J].
Boekaerts, M ;
de Koning, E ;
Vedder, P .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 41 (01) :33-51