Navigation surgery for intraoperative sentinel lymph node detection using Indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence real-time imaging in breast cancer

被引:0
作者
U. Toh
N. Iwakuma
M. Mishima
M. Okabe
S. Nakagawa
Y. Akagi
机构
[1] Kurume University School of Medicine,Department of Surgery
来源
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | 2015年 / 153卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Sentinel lymph node; Indocyanine green (ICG); Near-infrared fluorescence;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A new sensitive fluorescence imaging system was developed for the real-time identification of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with early breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of a color charge-coupled device camera system for the intraoperative detection of SLNs and to determine its clinical efficacy and sensitivity in patients with operable breast cancer. We assessed a total of 168 patients diagnosed with or suspected of having early-stage breast cancer without metastasis in SLNs. The intraoperative detection of SLNs was performed using the conventional Indigo Carmine dye (indigotindisulfonate sodium) technique combined with a new Indocyanine green (ICG) imaging system (HyperEye Medical System: HEMS, MIZUHO IKAKOGYO, Japan) to map SLNs, in which the lymphatic vessels and SLNs were visualized transcutaneously with illuminating ICG fluorescence. Between January 2012 and May 2013, SLNs were successfully identified in all 168 patients (detection rate: 100 %). By histopathology, the sensitivity was 93.8 % for the detection of the metastatic involvement of SLNs (15 of 16 nodal-positive patients). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months, none of the patients presented with axillary recurrence. These results suggest that the HEMS imaging system is a feasible and effective method for the detection of SLNs in breast cancer. Furthermore, the HEMS device permitted the transcutaneous visualization of lymphatic vessels under light conditions, thus facilitating the identification and detection of SLNs without affecting the surgical procedure, together with a high sensitivity and specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:337 / 344
页数:7
相关论文
共 107 条
[1]  
Lyman GH(2014)Sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with early-stage breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update J Clin Oncol 32 1365-1383
[2]  
Temin S(2014)Long-term follow-up of 5262 breast cancer patients with negative sentinel node and no axillary dissection confirms low rate of axillary disease Eur J Surg Oncol 40 1203-1208
[3]  
Edge SB(2003)A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer N Engl J Med 349 546-553
[4]  
Galimberti V(2006)Randomized multicenter trial of sentinel node biopsy versus standard axillary treatment in operable breast cancer: the ALMANAC Trial J Natl Cancer Inst 98 599-609
[5]  
Manika A(2006)Surgical complications associated with sentinel lymph node biopsy: results from a prospective international cooperative group trial Ann Surg Oncol 13 491-500
[6]  
Maisonneuve P(2006)Post-operative arm morbidity and quality of life. Results of the ALMANAC randomised trial comparing sentinel node biopsy with standard axillary treatment in the management of patients with early breast cancer Breast Cancer Res Treat 95 279-293
[7]  
Veronesi U(2002)Sensory morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary dissection: a prospective study of 233 women Ann Surg Oncol 9 654-662
[8]  
Paganelli G(2013)Impact of sentinel node biopsy on long-term quality of life in breast cancer patients Br J Cancer 109 2783-2791
[9]  
Viale G(2014)Sentinel node biopsy alone versus completion axillary node dissection in node positive breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis Int J Breast Cancer 2014 513780-31
[10]  
Mansel RE(2014)Shoulder and arm morbidity in sentinel node-negative breast cancer patients: a systematic review Breast Cancer Res Treat 144 21-28