Adjusted support vector machines based on a new loss function

被引:0
|
作者
Shuchun Wang
Wei Jiang
Kwok-Leung Tsui
机构
[1] Golden Arc Capital,Department of Systems Engineering & Engineering Management
[2] Inc.,School of Industrial & Systems Engineering
[3] Stevens Institute of Technology,undefined
[4] Georgia Institute of Technology,undefined
来源
Annals of Operations Research | 2010年 / 174卷
关键词
Classification error; Cross validation; Dispersion; Sampling bias;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Support vector machine (SVM) has attracted considerable attentions recently due to its successful applications in various domains. However, by maximizing the margin of separation between the two classes in a binary classification problem, the SVM solutions often suffer two serious drawbacks. First, SVM separating hyperplane is usually very sensitive to training samples since it strongly depends on support vectors which are only a few points located on the wrong side of the corresponding margin boundaries. Second, the separating hyperplane is equidistant to the two classes which are considered equally important when optimizing the separating hyperplane location regardless the number of training data and their dispersions in each class. In this paper, we propose a new SVM solution, adjusted support vector machine (ASVM), based on a new loss function to adjust the SVM solution taking into account the sample sizes and dispersions of the two classes. Numerical experiments show that the ASVM outperforms conventional SVM, especially when the two classes have large differences in sample size and dispersion.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 101
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy
    Ballabio, Cristiano
    Sterlacchini, Simone
    MATHEMATICAL GEOSCIENCES, 2012, 44 (01) : 47 - 70
  • [22] In-Sample and Out-of-Sample Model Selection and Error Estimation for Support Vector Machines
    Anguita, Davide
    Ghio, Alessandro
    Oneto, Luca
    Ridella, Sandro
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS AND LEARNING SYSTEMS, 2012, 23 (09) : 1390 - 1406
  • [23] Support Vector Machines for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: The Staffora River Basin Case Study, Italy
    Cristiano Ballabio
    Simone Sterlacchini
    Mathematical Geosciences, 2012, 44 : 47 - 70
  • [24] An efficient gradient-based model selection algorithm for multi-output least-squares support vector regression machines
    Zhu, Xinqi
    Gao, Zhenghong
    PATTERN RECOGNITION LETTERS, 2018, 111 : 16 - 22
  • [25] Transformer Fault Diagnosis Based on Support Vector Machine
    Zhang, Yan
    Zhang, Bide
    Yuan, Yuchun
    Pei, Zichun
    Wang, Yan
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2010 3RD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (ICCSIT 2010), VOL 6, 2010, : 405 - 408
  • [26] A New Hybrid Model Based on Least Squares Support Vector Machine for Project Selection Problem in Construction Industry
    Behnam Vahdani
    S. Meysam Mousavi
    H. Hashemi
    M. Mousakhani
    S. Ebrahimnejad
    Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 2014, 39 : 4301 - 4314
  • [27] A New Hybrid Model Based on Least Squares Support Vector Machine for Project Selection Problem in Construction Industry
    Vahdani, Behnam
    Mousavi, S. Meysam
    Hashemi, H.
    Mousakhani, M.
    Ebrahimnejad, S.
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 39 (05) : 4301 - 4314
  • [28] GPUSVM: a comprehensive CUDA based support vector machine package
    Li, Qi
    Salman, Raied
    Test, Erik
    Strack, Robert
    Kecman, Vojislav
    OPEN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 2011, 1 (04) : 387 - 405
  • [29] RESEARCH ON LANDSLIDE PREDICTION MODEL BASED ON SUPPORT VECTOR MODEL
    Zhao, Xiaowen
    Ji, Min
    Cui, Xianguo
    JOINT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON THEORY, DATA HANDLING AND MODELLING IN GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2010, 38 : 406 - 410
  • [30] Predicting Nitrate Concentration and Its Spatial Distribution in Groundwater Resources Using Support Vector Machines (SVMs) Model
    Arabgol, Raheleh
    Sartaj, Majid
    Asghari, Keyvan
    ENVIRONMENTAL MODELING & ASSESSMENT, 2016, 21 (01) : 71 - 82