Medical applications: A database and characterization of apps in Apple iOS and Android platforms

被引：38
作者：
Seabrook H.J. [1 ]
Stromer J.N. [1 ]
Shevkenek C. [1 ]
Bharwani A. [2 ]
De Grood J. [1 ]
Ghali W.A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构：
[1] Ward of the 21st Century, GD01 TRW Building, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 4Z6, AB
[2] Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, 1403 29th Street NW, Calgary, T2N 2 T9, AB
[3] Department of Community Health Sciences, Institute for Public Health, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, T2N 4Z6, AB
来源：
BMC Research Notes | / 7卷 / 1期
关键词：
App; Application; Handheld computer; Mobile health; Smartphone; Software;
D O I：
10.1186/1756-0500-7-573
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
Background: Medical applications (apps) for smart phones and tablet computers are growing in number and are commonly used in healthcare. In this context, there is a need for a diverse community of app users, medical researchers, and app developers to better understand the app landscape. Methods. In mid-2012, we undertook an environmental scan and classification of the medical app landscape in the two dominant platforms by searching the medical category of the Apple iTunes and Google Play app download sites. We identified target audiences, functions, costs and content themes using app descriptions and captured these data in a database. We only included apps released or updated between October 1, 2011 and May 31, 2012, with a primary "medical" app store categorization, in English, that contained health or medical content. Our sample of Android apps was limited to the most popular apps in the medical category. Results: Our final sample of Apple iOS (n = 4561) and Android (n = 293) apps illustrate a diverse medical app landscape. The proportion of Apple iOS apps for the public (35%) and for physicians (36%) is similar. Few Apple iOS apps specifically target nurses (3%). Within the Android apps, those targeting the public dominated in our sample (51%). The distribution of app functions is similar in both platforms with reference being the most common function. Most app functions and content themes vary considerably by target audience. Social media apps are more common for patients and the public, while conference apps target physicians. Conclusions: We characterized existing medical apps and illustrated their diversity in terms of target audience, main functions, cost and healthcare topic. The resulting app database is a resource for app users, app developers and health informatics researchers. © 2014 Seabrook et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 22 条
[11]  
Obiodu V., Obiodu E., An empirical review of the top 500 medical apps in a European Android market, J Mob Technol Med, 1, 4, pp. 22-37, (2012)
[12]  
Stromer J., Shevkenek B., Medical applications, Labarchives, (2013)
[13]  
Hachman M., Google Rebrands Android Market, Google Music As 'Play', (2012)
[14]  
Perez S., With new iOS 6 App Store, the most important changes are under the hood, TechCrunch, 2013, (2012)
[15]  
Braun V., Clarke V., Using thematic analysis in psychology, Qual Res Psychol, 3, 2, pp. 77-101, (2006)
[16]  
Eng D.S., Lee J.M., The promise and peril of mobile health applications for diabetes and endocrinology, Pediatr Diabetes, 14, 4, pp. 231-238, (2013)
[17]  
Franko O.I., Smartphone apps for orthopaedic surgeons, Clin Orthop, 469, 7, pp. 2042-2048, (2011)
[18]  
Franko O.I., Tirrell T.F., Smartphone app use among medical providers in ACGME training programs, J Med Syst, 36, 5, pp. 3135-3139, (2012)
[19]  
Meeker M., 2012 Internet Trends, D10 Conference, (2012)
[20]  
Van Velsen L., Beaujean D.J., Van Gemert-Pijnen J.E., Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity, BMC Med Inform Decis Mak, 13, (2013)
123