Prognostic risk model development and prospective validation among patients with cervical cancer stage IB2 to IIB submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

被引:0
作者
Kecheng Huang
Haiying Sun
Xiong Li
Ting Hu
Ru Yang
ShaoShuai Wang
Yao Jia
Zhilan Chen
Fangxu Tang
Jian Shen
Xiaomin Qin
Hang Zhou
Runfeng Yang
Juan Gui
Lin Wang
Xiaolin Zhao
Jincheng Zhang
Jiong Liu
Lili Guo
Shuang Li
Shixuan Wang
机构
[1] Tongji Hospital,From Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Tongji Medical College,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[3] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[4] Wuhan Central Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[5] Henan Cancer Hospital,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[6] Wuhan General Hospital of Guangzhou Military Command,undefined
[7] Xiangfan Central Hospital,undefined
[8] Tongji Medical College,undefined
[9] Huazhong University of Science and Technology,undefined
[10] Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital,undefined
[11] the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School,undefined
[12] Hubei Tumor Hospital,undefined
[13] Renmin Hospital,undefined
[14] Wuhan University,undefined
[15] Tai-He Hospital,undefined
[16] Hubei University of Medicine,undefined
[17] Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 6卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This study was designed to develop a risk model for disease recurrence among cervical cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery. Data for 853 patients were obtained from a retrospective study and used to train the model and then data for 447 patients from a prospective cohort study were employed to validate the model. The Cox regression model was used for calculating the coefficients of the risk factors. According to risk scores, patients were classified into high-, intermediate- and low-risk groups. There were 49 (49/144, 34%) recurrences observed in the high-risk group (with a risk score ≥ 2.65), compared with 3 (3/142, 2%) recurrences in the low-risk group (with a risk score < 0.90). Disease-free survival (DFS) was significantly different (log-rank p < 0.001) among the three risk groups; the risk model also revealed a significant increase in the accuracy of predicting 5-year DFS with the area under the ROC curve (AUC = 0.754 for risk model vs 0.679 for FIGO stage system); the risk model was also validated with data from the prospective study (log-rank p < 0.001, AUC = 0.766). Both high-risk and intermediate-risk patients can be more effectively identified by this risk model.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Torre LA(2015)Global cancer statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 65 87-108
[2]  
Sardi J(1993)Results of a prospective randomized trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB, bulky, squamous carcinoma of the cervix Gynecol Oncol 49 156-165
[3]  
Sardi J(1989)Is subradical surgical treatment for carcinoma of the cervix uteri stage IB logical? Gynecol Oncol 32 360-364
[4]  
Sardi J(1990)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix uteri Gynecol Oncol 38 486-493
[5]  
Sananes C(1988)Results of a phase II trial with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of the cervix uteri Gynecol Oncol 31 256-261
[6]  
Giaroli A(1997)Long-term follow-up of the first randomized trial using neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage Ib squamous carcinoma of the cervix: the final results Gynecol Oncol 67 61-69
[7]  
Maya G(2005)Randomized trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy comparing paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin with ifosfamide and cisplatin followed by radical surgery in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cervical carcinoma: the SNAP01 (Studio Neo-Adjuvante Portio) Italian Collaborative Study J Clin Oncol 23 4137-4145
[8]  
di Paola G(2002)Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical surgery versus exclusive radiotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer: results from the Italian multicenter randomized study J Clin Oncol 20 179-188
[9]  
Sardi JE(2000)Randomized trial of neoadjuvant cisplatin, vincristine, bleomycin and radical hysterectomy versus radiation therapy for bulky stage IB and IIA cervical cancer J Clin Oncol 18 1740-1747
[10]  
Sardi JE(2011)Clinical effects of irinotecan hydrochloride in combination with cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer Gynecol Oncol 123 99-104