The global politics of an urban age: creating 'cities for all' in the age of financialisation

被引:0
作者
Enora Robin
Frances Brill
机构
[1] University College London,City Leadership Laboratory, Department of Science, Technology, Engineering and Public Policy
[2] University College London,Department of Geography
关键词
D O I
10.1057/s41599-017-0056-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Our globalised and increasingly urban world demands an understanding of how ideas about how to build cities travel to become embedded in places. In this context, private actors operating across borders such as investors, real estate developers, international consultants, global construction companies and engineering firms appear as key agents of change in cities. However, real estate developers’ interactions with local stakeholders and their role in territorialising global financial strategies have been relatively under-explored in urban studies and global discussions about our 'urban future', especially within discussions on the implementation of the New Urban Agenda (NUA). This paper aims to initiate future research on this topic, providing some preliminary reflections on the role of developers as key transfer agents in the global movement of capital and its anchoring in places through the transformation of the urban built environment. In this way, we hope to offer some clarity on the transnational movement of financial capital to new places and markets, asking how real estate developers contribute to the dissemination of a global capitalist logic across cities, and what challenges this poses to the implementation of the NUA? To do so, the piece brings together insights from policy mobility literature and recent work on the financialisation of urban developments with the aim of critically assessing whether and how some of the key objectives of the NUA can be achieved in a context characterised by heavy involvement by real estate actors in city-making.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Aalbers MB(2017)The variegated financialization of housing Int J Urban Reg Res 41 542-554
  • [2] Bok R(2017)Geographies of policy knowledge: The state and corporate dimensions of contemporary policy mobilities Cities 63 51-57
  • [3] Coe N(2013)Is there space for better planning in a neoliberal world? Implications for planning practice and theory J Plan Educ Res 34 45-59
  • [4] Campbell H(2015)The limits to financialization Dialog- Human Geogr 5 183-200
  • [5] Tait M(2001)Diversity in real estate developer behaviour: A case for research Urban Policy Res 19 43-59
  • [6] Watkins C(2013)The adaptative nature of neoliberalism at the local scale: Fifteen years of city improvement districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg Antipode 45 121-139
  • [7] Christophers B(2016)London and New York as a safe deposit box for the transnational wealth elite Environ Plan A 48 2443-2461
  • [8] Coiacetto E(2011)Speculative urbanism and the making of the next world city Int J Urban Reg Res 35 555-581
  • [9] Didier S(2011)Bilbao and Barcelona ‘in motion’. How urban regeneration ‘models’ travel and mutate in the global flows of policy tourism Urban Stud 48 1397-1418
  • [10] Morange M(2017)Urban fortunes and skeleton cityscapes: real estate and late urbanization in Kigali and Addis Ababa Int J Urban Reg Res 41 786-803