Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Outsourced Professional Development for Online Teaching and Learning

被引:0
作者
Ling Zhao
Raymond A. Dixon
Tonia A. Dousay
Ali Carr-Chellman
机构
[1] University of Idaho,Department of Curriculum and Instruction
[2] University of Alaska Anchorage,School of Education
[3] University of Dayton,School of Education and Health Sciences
来源
TechTrends | 2024年 / 68卷
关键词
Online learning; Professional development; Community of practice; Higher education;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this phenomenological study was to explore faculty experiences with a professional development (PD) program designed to prepare them for improved online teaching and learning. The primary difference between this PD offering and others similar in content involves using an external vendor. The research question was: how do faculty perceive their experiences in an external PD program designed to prepare them for better online teaching and learning in an intentional community of practice? The researchers selected participants through a purposeful sampling method, collecting narrative data from eight faculty using in-depth, semi-structured interviews. An analysis of collected data revealed four emergent themes: (1) obtaining new knowledge, (2) confirmation of appropriate tools and strategies, (3) mixed learning experience, and (4) community bond. Although the participants’ academic backgrounds varied, most faculty obtained new technological and pedagogical knowledge by participating in the PD program. Some participants reaffirmed their previous knowledge; the PD program reinforced appropriate tools and strategies for these faculty members. Additionally, participants had mixed feelings about their learning experience. Some participants perceived the program as beneficial, while others felt the program repetitive. Furthermore, participants perceived a community bond. The investigation concluded with recommendations for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:268 / 280
页数:12
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Amrein-Beardsley A(2012)Peer observations among faculty in a college of education: Investigating the summative and formative uses of the reformed teaching observation protocol (RTOP) Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 24 5-24
[2]  
Osborn Popp SE(2013)Using the TPACK framework to unite disciplines in online learning Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 29 549-565
[3]  
Anderson A(1997)The place of inter-rater reliability in qualitative research: An empirical study Sociology 31 597-606
[4]  
Barham N(2013)The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning 2013 85-97
[5]  
Northcote M(2002)The reliability of assessment by portfolio on a course to develop and accredit teachers in higher education Studies in Higher Education 27 7-25
[6]  
Armstrong D(2011)Collaborative responsive education mentoring: Mentoring for professional development in higher education Florida Journal of Educational Administration & Policy 5 42-53
[7]  
Gosling A(2014)Adopting an online curriculum planning tool: Facilitation for teachers’ thinking about student-centered pedagogy and technology integration Journal of Technology and Teacher Education 22 423-447
[8]  
Weinman J(2000)The pain and ecstasy: Pre-service teacher perceptions on changing teacher roles and technology Journal of Educational Technology & Society 3 96-105
[9]  
Marteau T(2011)Peer observation of teaching: A decoupled process Active Learning in Higher Education 12 189-201
[10]  
Austin AE(2013)Teacher collaborative inquiry as a professional development intervention: Benefits and challenges Asia Pacific Education Review 14 559-568