Lactobacillus casei strain GG in the treatment of infants with acute watery diarrhea: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled clinical trial [ISRCTN67363048]

被引:75
作者
Salazar-Lindo E. [1 ]
Miranda-Langschwager P. [1 ]
Campos-Sanchez M. [2 ]
Chea-Woo E. [1 ]
Sack R.B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Pediatrics, Cayetano Heredia Hospital, Lima
[2] Department of Physics/Mathematics, Cayetano Heredia University, Lima
[3] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School, Department of International Health, Baltimore, MD
关键词
Diarrhea; Milk Formula; Oral Rehydration Solution; Acute Diarrhea; Oral Rehydration Salt;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2431-4-18
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Adjuvant therapy to ORT with probiotic bacteria for infants with acute watery diarrhea has been under active investigation. Most studies have been done in the developed world showing benefit only for viral mild gastroenteritis. We evaluated the effect of a milk formula containing one billion (109) cfu/ml of Lactobacillus casei strain GG (LGG) upon duration and severity of diarrhea in infants in an environment with more severe acute diarrhea, where etiologic agents other than rotavirus are involved more frequently, and where mixed infections are more prevalent. Methods: Male infants aged 3-36 months brought for treatment of acute watery diarrhea of less than 48 hours were eligible. After rehydration was completed with the WHO's oral rehydration solution, patients were randomly assigned to receive a milk formula either containing LGG or not. Stool volume was periodically measured using a devise suited to collect stools separate from urine. Duration of diarrhea was estimated based on stools physical characteristics. Results: Eighty nine patients received the placebo milk formula and ninety received the LGG containing formula. Both groups were comparable in their baseline characteristics. Total stool output was significantly larger (p = 0.047) in the LGG group (247.8 ml/kg) than in the placebo group (195.0 ml/kg). No significant differences were found in duration of diarrhea (58.5 hours with LGG vs. 50.4 hours with placebo), rate of treatment failure (21.1% with LGG vs. 18.0% with placebo), and proportion of patients with unresolved diarrhea after 120 hours (12.2% with LGG vs. 12.5% with placebo). The rate of stools with reducing substances after 24 hours of treatment increased significantly in both groups (from 41.4% to 72.2% with LGG and from 45.9% to 68.0% with placebo). Conclusion: This study did not show a positive effect of LGG on the clinical course of acute watery diarrhea. Positive beneficial effects of LGG, as had been reported elsewhere, could have been masked in our study by worsening diarrhea due to transient lactose malabsorption. Further studies with low-lactose or non-lactose conveyors of LGG are desirable. © 2004 Salazar-Lindo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Bern C., Martines J., de Zoysa I., Glass R.I., The magnitude of the global problem of diarrhoeal disease: A ten-year update, Bull. World Health Organ., 70, pp. 705-714, (1992)
[2]  
Santosham M., Keenan E.M., Tulloch J., Broun D., Glass R., Oral rehydration therapy for diarrhea: An example of reverse transfer of technology, Pediatrics, 100, (1997)
[3]  
el-Mougi M., el-Akkad N., Hendawi A., Hassan M., Amer A., Fontaine O., Pierce N.F., Is a low-osmolarity ORS solution more efficacious than standard WHO ORS solution?, J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 19, 1, pp. 83-86, (1994)
[4]  
Multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a reduced osmolarity oral rehydration salts solution in children with acute watery diarrhea, Pediatrics, 107, pp. 613-618, (2001)
[5]  
Rautanen T., Isolauri E., Salo E., Vesikari T., Management of acute diarrhoea with low osmolarity oral rehydration solutions and Lactobacillus strain GG, Arch. Dis. Child., 79, pp. 157-160, (1998)
[6]  
Isolauri E., Juntunen M., Rautanen T., Sillanaukee P., Koivula T., A human Lactobacillus strain (Lactobacillus casei sp strain GG) promotes recovery from acute diarrhea in children, Pediatrics, 88, pp. 90-97, (1991)
[7]  
Shornikova A.V., Isolauri E., Burkanova L., Lukovnikova S., Vesikari T., A trial in the Karelian Republic of oral rehydration and Lactobacillus GG for treatment of acute diarrhoea, Acta Paediatr., 86, pp. 460-465, (1997)
[8]  
Guandalini S., Pensabene L., Zikri M.A., Dias J.A., Casali L.G., Hoekstra H., Kolacek S., Massar K., Micetic-Turk D., Papadopoulou A., de Sousa J.S., Sandhu B., Szajewska H., Weizman Z., Lactobacillus GG administered in oral rehydration solution to children with acute diarrhea: A multicenter European trial, J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 30, pp. 54-60, (2000)
[9]  
Costa-Ribeiro H., Ribeiro T.C., Mattos A.P., Valois S.S., Neri D.A., Almeida P., Cerqueira C.M., Ramos E., Young R.J., Vanderhoof J.A., Limitations of probiotic therapy in acute, severe dehydrating diarrhea, J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr., 36, 1, pp. 112-115, (2003)
[10]  
Pazzaglia G., Sack R.B., Salazar-Lindo E., Yi A., Chea E., Leon-Barua R., Guerrero C.E., Palomino J., High frequency of coinfecting enteropathogens in Aeromonas - Associated diarrhea of hospitalized Peruvian infants, J. Clin. Microbiol., 29, pp. 1151-1156, (1991)