Suitability of open-access elevation models for micro-scale watershed planning

被引:0
作者
Arif Oguz Altunel
机构
[1] Kastamonu University,The Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Forestry
来源
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment | 2018年 / 190卷
关键词
Watershed parameters; Elevation models; GIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Watershed planning is a major issue in Turkey and other parts of the world. Surrounded by seawater on almost three-quarters of its international borders and by sheer mountains along the coastal regions and throughout the country, Turkey experiences a range of climatic changes, which constantly shape its topography. Recently, the occurrences of floods, landslides, and torrents have increased, forcing decision-makers to come up with solutions to manage and rehabilitate the upper watersheds in order to stop or limit the impact of disasters on downstream areas. Possible solutions should reduce flow coefficients, erosion, and sedimentation and increase reservoir capacities. It is expected that torrent volumes will decrease, drainage regimes on slopes will be better organized and adjusted, thawing snow will be better deposited and delayed, evapotranspiration will increase, surface runoffs will be delayed, and water regimes will be better managed, meaning that flood and torrent control will be achieved. For the reasons mentioned above, watershed parameters need to be firmly set. In the scope of this study, the elevation, slope acreage, and reservoir capacity of a small watershed, as extracted from open-access elevation models, were compared to a real-time kinematic (RTK) global positioning system (GPS)-generated point cloud and the resulting elevation model through various geospatial and analytical means. The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) C-band digital elevation model (DEM) (version 3) proved to be a satisfactory method in making residual, correlation, mean, and reservoir capacity comparisons. An L-band Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) phased-array-type synthetic aperture radar (PALSAR) and an X-band DLR_SRTM ASTER were slightly superior methods in terms of defining a greater number of slope categories than the other models. Finally, DLR_SRTM and SRTMv3 could match a greater number of slope façades than the other models. Seventeen years after its acquisition, SRTM and its derivatives have continued leading the topographic definition of the Earth.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Aguilar FJ(2005)Effects of terrain morphology, sampling density, and interpolation methods on grid DEM accuracy Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 71 805-816
[2]  
Agüera F(2012)Comparability studies of high and low resolution digital elevation models for watershed delineation in the tropics: Case of Densu River basin of Ghana International Journal of Cooperative Studies. 1 9-14
[3]  
Aguilar MA(2015)A critical review of integrated river basin management in the upper Blue Nile river basin: The case of Ethiopia International Journal of River Basin Management 13 429-442
[4]  
Carvajal F(2016)Building virtual watersheds: A global opportunity to strengthen resource management and conservation Environmental Management 57 722-739
[5]  
Anornu GK(2010)Contribution of Alaskan glaciers to sea-level rise derived from satellite imagery Nature Geoscience 3 92-95
[6]  
Kortatsi BK(2016)UAVs as remote sensing platform in glaciology: Present applications and future prospects Remote Sensing of Environment 175 196-204
[7]  
Asmamaw DK(1997)Comparison of techniques for generating digital terrain models from contour lines International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11 451-473
[8]  
Benda L(2014)Assimilating passive microwave remote sensing data into a land surface model to improve the estimation of snow depth Remote Sensing of Environment 143 54-63
[9]  
Miller D(2016)Vertical accuracy assessment for SRTM and ASTER Digital Elevation Models: A case study of Najran city, Saudi Arabia Ain Shams Engineering Journal 2 1-11
[10]  
Barquin J(1997)Resolution and accuracy of terrain representation by grid dems at a micro-scale International Journal of Geographical Information Science 11 199-212