CT pulmonary angiogram quality comparison between early and later pregnancy

被引:8
作者
Siegel Y. [1 ,2 ]
Kuker R. [1 ,2 ]
Banks J. [2 ]
Danton G. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, JMH WW 279, 1611 N.W. 12th Ave, Miami, 33136, FL
[2] Jackson Memorial Hospital, JMH WW 279, 1611 N.W. 12th Ave, Miami, 33136, FL
关键词
CT pulmonary angiogram; Pregnancy; Pulmonary embolism;
D O I
10.1007/s10140-017-1506-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Pregnancy increases the risk for thromboembolic disease. CT pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) is widely used for the diagnosis of pulmonary embolus (PE); however, a significant number of scans are suboptimal or non-diagnostic in pregnant patients. This phenomenon is attributed to physiology during the gravid state. The aim of this study is to examine whether all stages of pregnancy are similarly at risk for suboptimal scans. Methods: Pregnant patients who had CTPA scans between February 2008 and November 2014 were included. The attenuation in the major pulmonary arteries was compared among patients and controls. An attenuation of 200 Hounsfield units (HU) was used as a cutoff between adequate and suboptimal studies. Statistical analysis compared attenuation means and number of arteries with adequate versus suboptimal attenuation. Results: Forty patients were included in the study. Nine were at or below 13 weeks of pregnancy and 31 between week 14 and term. A control group of 14 non-pregnant women of similar age were also included. All arteries showed a significantly higher attenuation in early pregnancy and in the control group compared to later in pregnancy, p < 0.05. Fewer suboptimal opacified arteries were found in early pregnancy (11.1%) and controls (5.7%) compared to later in pregnancy (33.3%), p < 0.01. Conclusion: Patients in early pregnancy are more likely to have a technically successful CTPA scan compared to later in pregnancy and show similar opacification to non-pregnant women. This suggests a possible paradigm shift from the current approach to suspected PE in pregnant patients. © 2017, American Society of Emergency Radiology.
引用
收藏
页码:635 / 640
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Lindqvist P., Dahlback B., Marsal K., Thrombotic risk during pregnancy: a population study, Obstet Gynecol, 94, 4, pp. 595-599, (1999)
[2]  
Heit J.A., Kobbervig C.E., James A.H., Petterson T.M., Bailey K.R., Melton L.J., Trends in the incidence of venous thromboembolism during pregnancy or postpartum: a 30-year population-based study, Ann Intern Med, 143, pp. 697-706, (2005)
[3]  
Chang J., Elam-Evans L.D., Berg C.J., Herndon J., Flowers L., Seed K.A., Syverson C.J., Pregnancy-related mortality surveillance—United States, 1991--1999, MMWR Surveill Summ, 52, 2, pp. 1-8, (2003)
[4]  
Coche E., Verschuren F., Keyeux A., Et al., Diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism in outpatients: comparison of thin-collimation multi-detector row spiral CT and planar ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy, Radiology, 229, pp. 757-765, (2003)
[5]  
Winer-Muram H.T., Rydberg J., Johnson M.S., Et al., Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography, Radiology, 233, 3, pp. 806-815, (2004)
[6]  
Wang F., Fang W., Lv B., Lu J.G., Et al., Comparison of lung scintigraphy with multi-slice spiral computed tomography in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism, Clin Nucl Med, 34, 7, pp. 424-427, (2009)
[7]  
Revel M.P., Cohen S., Sanchez O., Collignon M.A., Et al., Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: diagnosis with lung scintigraphy or CT angiography?, Radiology, 258, 2, pp. 590-598, (2011)
[8]  
Perisinakis K., Seimenis I., Tzedakis A., Et al., Perfusion scintigraphy versus 256-slice CT angiography in pregnant patients suspected of pulmonary embolism: comparison of radiation risks, J Nucl Med, 55, 8, pp. 1273-1280, (2014)
[9]  
U-King-Im J.M., Freeman S.J., Boylan T., Et al., Quality of CT pulmonary angiography for suspected pulmonary embolus in pregnancy, Eur Radiol, 18, 12, pp. 2709-2715, (2008)
[10]  
Andreou A.K., Curtin J.J., Wilde S., Clark A., Does pregnancy affect vascularenhancement in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?, Eur Radiol, 18, 12, pp. 2716-2722, (2008)