Prediction performance analysis of neural network models for an electrical discharge turning process

被引:0
作者
Kumaresh Dey
Kanak Kalita
Shankar Chakraborty
机构
[1] Jadavpur University,Production Engineering Department
[2] Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology,Department of Mechanical Engineering
来源
International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | 2023年 / 17卷
关键词
Electrical discharge turning; Prediction; Neural network; Response; Statistical error metric;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In many of the modern-day manufacturing industries, electrical discharge machining (EDM) now appears as an effective non-traditional material removal process for generating intricate shape geometries on various hard-to-cut work materials to meet the ever-increasing demands of higher dimensional accuracy and better surface quality. Development of an appropriate prediction model for any of the EDM processes is quite difficult due to complex material removal mechanism, and dynamic interactions between the input parameters and responses. To address the problem, this paper proposes development and deployment of five neural network models, i.e. feed forward neural network, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network, general regression neural network and long short term memory-based recurrent neural network as effective prediction tools for an electrical discharge turning (EDT) process. The EDT is a variant of EDM process involving removal of material from cylindrical workpieces. The input parameters for the considered EDT process are magnetic field, pulse current, pulse duration and angular velocity, whereas, the responses are material removal rate and overcut. Several statistical error metrics, like R-squared (R2), adjusted R-squared (R2adj), root mean square error and relative root mean square error are employed to compare the prediction accuracy of all the investigated neural network models. Based on a past experimental dataset, it is observed that long short term memory-based recurrent neural network provides more accurate prediction of both the responses under consideration. On the other hand, general regression neural network is noticed to be extremely robust having highly repetitive prediction performance.
引用
收藏
页码:827 / 845
页数:18
相关论文
共 143 条
[31]  
Alimoradi A(2021)Analysis of different RNN autoencoder variants for time series classification and machine prognostics J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 15 1735-176
[32]  
Song KY(2019)Intelligent pulse analysis of high-speed electrical discharge machining using different RNNs IEEE Commun. Mag. 57 291-294
[33]  
Chung DK(1997)Prediction of flank wear and surface roughness by recurrent neural network in turning process Neural Comput. 9 1-1013
[34]  
Park MS(2021)Deep learning with long short-term memory for time series prediction Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 154 168-undefined
[35]  
Chu CN(2020)Long short term memory J. Colloid Interface Sci. 565 7087-undefined
[36]  
Azhiri RB(1995)Quantitative risk assessment of explosion rescue by integrating CFD modeling with GRNN J. Comput. Civ. Eng. 9 285-undefined
[37]  
Bideskan AS(2020)Quantification of interfacial energies associated with membrane fouling in a membrane bioreactor by using BP and GRNN artificial neural networks Sensors 20 995-undefined
[38]  
Javidpour F(2021)Neural network for structure control Math. Prob. Eng. 15 undefined-undefined
[39]  
Tekiyeh RM(1982)Comparison of machine learning algorithms for structure state prediction in operational load monitoring J. Stat. Comput. Simul. 38 undefined-undefined
[40]  
Natarajan KK(2019)Prediction of responses in a sustainable dry turning operation: A comparative analysis J. Reinf. Plast. Compos. undefined undefined-undefined