The current status of positron emission mammography in breast cancer diagnosis

被引:0
作者
Vasileios Kalles
George C. Zografos
Xeni Provatopoulou
Dimitra Koulocheri
Antonia Gounaris
机构
[1] University of Athens,Breast Unit, 1st Propaedeutic Surgical Clinic, Hippocratio General Hospital
[2] Hellenic Anticancer Institute,Research Center
[3] University of Athens,Department of Radiology, Hippocratio General Hospital
来源
Breast Cancer | 2013年 / 20卷
关键词
Breast cancer; Positron emission mammography; PET/CT; Positron emission tomography;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Mammography is currently the standard breast cancer screening procedure, even though it is constrained by low specificity in the detection of malignancy and low sensitivity in women with dense breast tissue. Modern imaging modalities, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), have been developed in an effort to replace or complement mammography, because the early detection of breast cancer is critical for efficient treatment and long-term survival of patients. Nuclear medicine imaging technology has been introduced in the field of oncology with the development of positron emission tomography (PET), positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and, ultimately, positron emission mammography (PEM). PET offers the advantage of precise diagnosis, by measuring metabolism with the use of a radiotracer and identifying changes at the cellular level. PET/CT imaging allows for a more accurate assessment by merging the anatomic localization to the functional image. However, both techniques have not yet been established as diagnostic tools in early breast cancer detection, primarily because of low sensitivity, especially for sub-centimeter and low-grade tumors. PEM, a breast-specific device with increased spatial resolution, has been developed in order to overcome these limitations. It has demonstrated higher detectability than PET/CT and comparable or better sensitivity than MRI. The ability to target the lesions visible in PEM with PEM-guided breast biopsy systems adds to its usability in the early diagnosis of breast cancer. The results from recent studies summarized in this review indicate that PEM may prove to be a useful first-line diagnostic tool, although further evaluation and improvement are required.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 130
页数:7
相关论文
共 350 条
[1]  
DeSantis C(2012)Breast cancer statistics, 2011 CA Cancer J Clin 61 409-418
[2]  
Siegel R(2011)Breast cancer imaging devices Semin Nucl Med 41 229-241
[3]  
Bandi P(2010)Positive predictive value of mammography: comparison of interpretations of screening and diagnostic images by the same radiologist and by different radiologists AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 782-785
[4]  
Jemal A(2010)Reasons women at elevated risk of breast cancer refuse breast MR imaging screening: aCRIN 6666 Radiology 254 79-87
[5]  
Moadel RM(1993)Imaging of the radiographically dense breast Radiology 188 297-301
[6]  
Halladay JR(2010)BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study J Clin Oncol 28 5265-5273
[7]  
Yankaskas BC(2006)Nonpalpable mammographically occult invasive breast cancers detected by MRI AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 865-870
[8]  
Bowling JM(2003)MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results Radiology 226 773-778
[9]  
Alexander C(2007)MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 1295-1303
[10]  
Berg WA(2003)MR imaging of the ipsilateral breast in women with percutaneously proven breast cancer AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 901-910