A New Method for a Virtue-Based Responsible Conduct of Research Curriculum: Pilot Test Results

被引:0
作者
Eric Berling
Chet McLeskey
Michael O’Rourke
Robert T. Pennock
机构
[1] Michigan State University,Lyman Briggs College and Department of Philosophy
[2] Michigan State University,Center for Interdisciplinarity
[3] Michigan State University,Department of Philosophy, AgBio Research, Center for Interdisciplinarity
[4] Michigan State University,Lyman Briggs College and Departments of Philosophy and Computer Science & Engineering
来源
Science and Engineering Ethics | 2019年 / 25卷
关键词
Scientific integrity; Scientific virtues; Science ethics; Scientific misconduct; Responsible conduct of research; RCR training; Research integrity; Toolbox Dialogue Initiative;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Drawing on Pennock’s theory of scientific virtues, we are developing an alternative curriculum for training scientists in the responsible conduct of research (RCR) that emphasizes internal values rather than externally imposed rules. This approach focuses on the virtuous characteristics of scientists that lead to responsible and exemplary behavior. We have been pilot-testing one element of such a virtue-based approach to RCR training by conducting dialogue sessions, modeled upon the approach developed by Toolbox Dialogue Initiative, that focus on a specific virtue, e.g., curiosity and objectivity. During these structured discussions, small groups of scientists explore the roles they think the focus virtue plays and should play in the practice of science. Preliminary results have shown that participants strongly prefer this virtue-based model over traditional methods of RCR training. While we cannot yet definitively say that participation in these RCR sessions contributes to responsible conduct, these pilot results are encouraging and warrant continued development of this virtue-based approach to RCR training.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 910
页数:11
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
Ainley M(2011)Student engagement with science in early adolescence. The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 4-12
[2]  
Ainley J(2010)Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making Academic Medicine 85 519-26
[3]  
Antes AL(1999)Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education Educational Researcher 28 18-498
[4]  
Wang X(1998)Effects of training in the responsible conduct of research: A survey of graduate students in experimental sciences Science and Engineering Ethics 4 487-373
[5]  
Mumford MD(2016)Research as profession and practice: Frameworks for guiding the responsible conduct of research Accountability in Research 23 351-395
[6]  
Brown RP(2006)Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1 43-8415
[7]  
Connelly S(2004)Is compliance a professional virtue of researchers? Reflections on promoting the responsible conduct of research Ethics and Behavior 14 383-871
[8]  
Devenport LD(2009)Teaching and assessing the responsible conduct of research: A Delphi consensus panel report The Journal of Research Administration 40 49-460
[9]  
Bebeau MJ(2014)Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111 8410-171
[10]  
Rest JR(1994)The hidden curriculum, ethics teaching, and the structure of medical education Academic Medicine 69 861-1954