Economic considerations of breeding for polledness versus disbudding in beef cattle

被引:0
作者
Ingrid Pereira Pinto Oliveira
Silel Vinicius Simões Andrade Maciel
Caio Victor Damasceno Carvalho
Raphael Bermal Costa
Gregório Miguel Ferreira de Camargo
机构
[1] Universidade Federal da Bahia (UFBA),
[2] Universidade Federal do Oeste da Bahia (UFOB),undefined
来源
Tropical Animal Health and Production | 2023年 / 55卷
关键词
Horn; Nelore; Animal welfare; Genetic selection; Livestock;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The domestication of animals has rendered horns less necessary for survival. Moreover, the use of polled and disbudded animals is interesting in order to avoid injuries of animals and handlers, among other advantages. We therefore conducted a comparative economic analysis of different traditional disbudding techniques versus selective breeding for polledness in Nelore cattle, the main beef breed of tropical systems in Brazil. The cost to obtain animals without horns was estimated in three different scenarios: disbudding with hot iron, disbudding with caustic paste, and phenotypic selection for polled animals. Price quotations of the materials were obtained in different states of the country and averaged. An initial frequency of horned animals of 92.16% was obtained based on the records of the Brazilian Association of Zebu Breeders. Selective breeding was found to be the best cost-effective scenario. This result differs from intensive production systems of dairy cattle in which traditional disbudding continues to be the best cost-effective scenario. The main explanation is the lack of difference in the price of Nelore semen from polled and horned bulls. Phenotypic selection for polled animals is the best cost-effective method, and it is in accordance with welfare practices. Care should be taken regarding the intensive use of few polled breeding animals in order to avoid inbreeding depression in other traits.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 144 条
  • [1] Adcock SJJ(2020)Conditioned place preference reveals ongoing pain in calves 3 weeks after disbudding Scientific Reports 10 1-9
  • [2] Tucker CB(2015)Effect of analgesia and anti-inflammatory treatment on weight gain and milk intake of dairy calves after disbudding New Zealand Veterinary Journal 63 153-157
  • [3] Bates AJ(2020)US respondents’ willingness to pay for Cheddar cheese from dairy cattle with different pasture access, antibiotic use, and dehorning practices American Dairy Science 103 3234-3249
  • [4] Eder P(2022)Indication of social buffering in disbudded calves Scientific Reports 12 1-8
  • [5] Laven RA(2013)Factors associated with calf mortality in tropically adapted beef breeds managed in extensive Australian production systems Animal Production Science 54 25-36
  • [6] Bir C(2015)A simple strategy for managing recessive disorders in a dairy cattle breeding program Genetics Selection Evolution 47 1-13
  • [7] Widmar NO(2019)Estrutura populacional e depressão endogâmica em características de crescimento de bovinos da raça Nelore criados no bioma Amazônia Livestock Research for Rural Development 31 1-12
  • [8] Thompson NM(2020)Disbudding affects use of a shelter provided to group-housed dairy calves Journal of Dairy Science 103 10519-10529
  • [9] Townsend J(2015)Polled Fleckvieh (Simmental) cattle – Current state of the breeding program Livestock Science 179 80-85
  • [10] Wolf CA(2015)Attitudes of farmers towards cattle dehorning Livestock Science 179 12-21