A multi-criteria decision analysis of solid waste treatment options in Pakistan: Lahore City—a case in point

被引:23
作者
Ali Y. [1 ]
Aslam Z. [2 ]
Dar H.S. [2 ]
Mumtaz U.U. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Management Science and Humanities, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi, KPK
[2] Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Ghulam Ishaq Khan Institute of Engineering Sciences and Technology, Topi, Swabi
关键词
AHP; TOPSIS; Waste management; Waste treatment and decision making;
D O I
10.1007/s10669-018-9672-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Population of the world is increasing day by day, resulting in enormous amount of waste production. In the modern age of great technological advancements, there needs to be a systematic method to keep the environment clean. The waste management activities, i.e., collection, transport and disposal, pose a great challenge to the waste managers as they have to factor in various eclectic factors such as land availability, facilities available, budget, time required and the impact it would have on the environment, while tackling this problem. Lahore, despite being the most developed city of Pakistan, does not have a suitable solid waste management system. An increasing population leads to more waste generation, and in Lahore the situation is no different. Several waste management companies are working in the city, but as of yet they have not been able to make significant inroads to completely eradicate the problem. The aim of this paper is to suggest a suitable way for dealing with the waste. To accomplish this aim, a hierarchy-based model is used, considering six criteria and five alternatives. We used multi-criteria decision analysis to decide among different waste management alternatives. Forecasting has been used to find the population and waste produced over the years. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) are used to rank the feasible alternative. The results show that the population and waste were increasing drastically. Aerobic digestion was ranked as the best alternative for waste management according to AHP and TOPSIS, but there is great variation among the rank of other alternatives. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:528 / 543
页数:15
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Abduli M., Naghib A., Yonesi M., Akbari A., Life cycle assessment (LCA) of solid waste management strategies in Tehran: landfill and composting plus landfill, Environ Monit Assess, 178, pp. 487-498, (2011)
  • [2] Achillas C., Moussiopoulos N., Karagiannidis A., Banias G., Perkoulidis G., The use of multi-criteria decision analysis to tackle waste management problems: a literature review, Waste Manag Res, 31, pp. 115-129, (2013)
  • [3] Afon A.O., Informal sector initiative in the primary sub-system of urban solid waste management in Lagos, Nigeria, Habitat Int, 31, pp. 193-204, (2007)
  • [4] The World Factbook 2012–13, (2013)
  • [5] Ali Y., Iftikhar N., Edwin A.C., Assessment of career selection problems in developing countries: a MCDM approach, Int J Anal Hierarchy Process, (2017)
  • [6] Ali Y., Asghar A., Muhammad N., Salman A., Selection of a fighter aircraft to improve the effectiveness of air combat in war on terror: Pakistan Air Force—a case in point, Int J Anal Hierarchy Process, (2017)
  • [7] Ali Y., Rasheed Z., Muhammad N., Yousaf S., Energy optimization in the wake of China Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), Journal of Control and Decision, 5, 2, pp. 129-147, (2017)
  • [8] Ali Y., Butt M., sabir M., Mumtaz U., Salman A., Selection of suitable site in Pakistan for wind power plant installation using analytic hierarchy process (AHP), Journal of Control and Decision, 5, 2, pp. 117-128, (2017)
  • [9] Andreescu C., Clenci A., Proceedings of the European Automotive Congress EAEC-ESFA 2015, (2015)
  • [10] Babalola M.A., A multi-criteria decision analysis of waste treatment options for food and biodegradable waste management in Japan, Environments, 2, pp. 471-488, (2015)