Using a multiagent organizational approach to improve knowledge provision for shared decision making in patient-physician relationships: an example from Germany

被引:2
作者
Schuele M. [1 ]
Widmer T. [1 ]
Premm M. [1 ]
Criegee-Rieck M. [2 ]
Wickramasinghe N. [3 ]
机构
[1] University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart
[2] Friedrich-Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuernberg, Nuernberg
[3] Epworth HealthCare & RMIT University, Richmond
关键词
eHealth; Knowledge sharing; Multiagent systems; Shared decision making;
D O I
10.1007/s12553-015-0102-6
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An integral aspect of sound patient centric healthcare delivery is the notion of shared decision making between patient and provider. This paradigm is well documented in the extant literature. However, what appears to be a stumbling block to date is successfully implementing such an approach within established healthcare processes. This void is causing problems in healthcare delivery in particular in EU countries such as Germany because knowledge sources are distributed and underlie strict privacy policies; while the lack of adequate shared decision making compromises the quality of healthcare delivery and can lead to errors and inefficient workflow. This paper which is based on an extensive research project serves to analyze the provision of personal guidance services for shared decision making in eHealth service networks. By doing so, we address the problem of distributed and privacy-aware knowledge sharing by the formation of agent-based organizations to represent the relationships of patients and physicians and study this problem from the perspective of multiagent systems; i.e., we develop technology enabled collaboration solutions. The efficacy of the proffered decision support system will be demonstrated by a scenario-based evaluation. We contend that such an approach will address the current void. © 2015, IUPESM and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 23
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Hartman M., Martin A., McDonnell P., Catlin A., National health spending in 2007: slower drug spending contributes to lowest rate of overall growth since 1998, Health Aff, 28, 1, (2009)
  • [2] Berwick D.M., Disseminating innovations in health care, JAMA, (2003)
  • [3] Duckett S., Willcox S., The Australian health care system (4th Revised edition.), Oxford University Press, (2011)
  • [4] Tang P.C., Overhage J.M., Chan A.S., Brown N.L., Aghighi B., Entwistle M.P., Et al., Online disease management of diabetes: Engaging and Motivating Patients Online With Enhanced Resources-Diabetes (EMPOWER-D), a randomized controlled trial, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 20, 3, pp. 526-534, (2013)
  • [5] Wickramasinghe N., Schaffer J., Realizing value driven e-health solutions, (2010)
  • [6] Sulaiman H., Wickramasinghe N., Assimilating healthcare information systems in a Malaysian Hospital, Commun Assoc Inf Syst (CAIS, 34, pp. 1291-1318, (2014)
  • [7] Andre B., Inger Ringdal G., Loge J.H., Rannestad T., Laerum H., Kaasa S., Experiences with the implementation of computerized tools in health care units: a review article, Int J Hum Comput Interact, 24, 8, pp. 753-775, (2008)
  • [8] Bernstein M.L., McCreless T., Cote M.J., Five constants of information technology adoption in healthcare, Hosp Top, 85, 1, pp. 17-25, (2007)
  • [9] Boonstra A., Broekhuis M., Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions, BMC Health Serv Res, 10, 1, (2010)
  • [10] Kennedy B.L., Exploring the sustainment of health information technology: successful practices for addressing human factors, (2011)