Incorporating Human Body Variance in an Analytically Focused Undergraduate Biomechanics Course

被引:0
作者
Sara Schley
Mel Chua
Joseph Le Doux
Veronica van Montfrans
Todd Fernandez
机构
[1] Georgia Institute of Technology,Coulter Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] Translational Biology,undefined
[3] Medicine,undefined
[4] and Health,undefined
[5] Virginia Tech,undefined
来源
Biomedical Engineering Education | 2023年 / 3卷 / 2期
关键词
Pedagogy; Curricular design; Biomechanics; Engineering education; Inclusion; Universal design;
D O I
10.1007/s43683-023-00108-4
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Human bodies vary widely: height, weight, blood volume, handedness, strength, and variations from disabilities, trauma, genetics, etc. Engineers must be trained to include human variance when designing human-interactive systems. Typically, this is not incorporated into mathematical and modeling focused courses. In the spring of 2019, one of three sections of an introduction to biomechanics course was modified to adopt interactive group problem solving and add human body parameter variation to the problems that students solved. Problems were solved for multiple body sizes. Initial evidence suggests this was successful in increasing students’ consideration of human variation and user needs in mathematical modeling and in increasing their mention of specific body parameters and parameter variation. This can be implemented by a wide variety of instructors without special training in pedagogy or in universal design, especially when a course already features interactive small group problem solving, even during a large lecture by having students’ pair to solve equations briefly. Future steps might consider other parameters of diversity, inclusion, or equity topics. We were pleased to see that small changes in pedagogical approach can pay significant dividends encouraging students to situate analytic work in realistic engineering contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / 351
页数:6
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Adusumilli PS(2004)Left-handed surgeons: are they left out? Curr Surg 61 587-591
[2]  
Kell C(2019)A how-to guide for promoting diversity and inclusion in biomedical engineering Annu Biomed Eng 47 1167-1170
[3]  
Chang JH(2000)A project-based spiral curriculum for introductory courses in chemical engineering Chem Eng Educ 34 296-303
[4]  
Tuorto S(2021)Motor vehicle crash testing regulations for more inclusive populations J Sci Policy Gov 18 e410-e410
[5]  
Leitman IM(2013)Learning to model in engineering Math Think Learn 15 259-290
[6]  
Chesler NC(2018)When world (view)s collide: contested epistemologies and ontologies in transdisciplinary education Int J Eng Educ 34 574-589
[7]  
Dixon A(2018)Enhance engineering design education in the middle years with authentic engineering problems J Mech Des 140 122001-143
[8]  
Clark WM(1999)What is a spiral curriculum? Med Teach 21 141-307
[9]  
Dibiasio D(2012)Focusing on vulnerable populations in crashes: recent advances in finite element human models for injury biomechanics research J Automot Saf Eng 3 295-28
[10]  
Frye H(2008)All problems are not equal: implications for PBL Interdiscip J Probl-Based Learn 2 6-29