Grounding global environmental assessments through bottom-up futures based on local practices and perspectives

被引:0
作者
Laura Pereira
Ghassem R. Asrar
Rohan Bhargava
Laur Hesse Fisher
Angel Hsu
Jason Jabbour
Jeanne Nel
Odirilwe Selomane
Nadia Sitas
Christopher Trisos
James Ward
Mandy van den Ende
Joost Vervoort
Amy Weinfurter
机构
[1] Stellenbosch University,Centre for Sustainability Transitions
[2] University of the Witwatersrand,Global Change Institute
[3] Utrecht University,Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development
[4] Stockholm Resilience Centre,Urban Systems Lab
[5] Universities Space Research Association,Environmental Solutions Initiative
[6] New School,Department of Public Policy
[7] Massachusetts Institute of Technology,Department of Conservation Ecology
[8] University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill,African Climate and Development Initiative
[9] Technischen Universität Berlin,undefined
[10] United Nations Environment Programme,undefined
[11] Nelson Mandela University,undefined
[12] Stellenbosch University,undefined
[13] University of Cape Town,undefined
[14] University of South Australia,undefined
来源
Sustainability Science | 2021年 / 16卷
关键词
Futures thinking; Global environmental assessments; Innovation; Participatory processes; Scenarios; Sustainable development goals; Transformations;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Future scenarios and pathways of potential development trajectories are powerful tools to assist with decision-making to address many sustainability challenges. Such scenarios play a major role in global environmental assessments (GEAs). Currently, however, scenarios in GEAs are mostly developed at the global level by experts and researchers, and locally imagined, bottom-up scenarios do not play a role in such assessments. In this paper, we argue that addressing future sustainability challenges for achieving more equitable development in GEAs requires a more explicit role for bottom-up inspired futures. To this end, this paper employs an innovative global assessment framework for exploring alternative futures that are grounded in local realities and existing practical actions, and that can be appropriately scaled to the required decision-making level. This framework was applied in the context of the UN’s Global Environment Outlook 6, a major example of a GEA. We developed novel methods for synthesizing insights from a wide range of local practices and perspectives into global futures. We collected information from crowdsourcing platforms, outcomes of participatory workshops in different regions of the world, and an assessment of reported regional outlooks. We analysed these according to a framework also used by an integrated assessment model in the same GEA. We conclude that bottom-up approaches to identify and assess transformative solutions that envision future pathways towards greater sustainability significantly strengthen current GEA scenario-development approaches. They provide decision makers with required actionable information based on tangible synergistic solutions that have been tested on the ground. This work has revealed that there are significant opportunities for the integration of bottom-up knowledge and insights into GEAs, to make such assessments more salient and valuable to decision makers.
引用
收藏
页码:1907 / 1922
页数:15
相关论文
共 189 条
[1]  
Abbott KW(2012)The transnational regime complex for climate change Environ Plan C Gov Policy 30 571-590
[2]  
Adger WN(2009)Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change Front Ecol Environ 7 150-157
[3]  
Eakin H(2020)A review of indigenous food crops in africa and the implications for more sustainable and healthy food systems Sustainability 12 3493-73
[4]  
Winkels A(2009)Transnational climate governance Glob Environ Polit 9 52-329
[5]  
Akinola R(2003)Why global scenarios need ecology Front Ecol Environ 1 322-448
[6]  
Pereira LM(2016)Bright spots: seeds of a good anthropocene Front Ecol Environ 14 441-761
[7]  
Mabhaudhi T(2015)The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship Anthr Rev 40 739-16
[8]  
Andonova LB(2018)A political economy of niche-building: Neoliberal-developmental encounters in photovoltaic electrification in Kenya Energy Res Soc Sci 44 6-698
[9]  
Betsill MM(2019)GCAM v5.1: representing the linkages between energy, water, land, climate, and economic systems Geosci Model Dev 12 677-247
[10]  
Bulkeley H(2020)The future of global environmental assessments: making a case for fundamental change The Anthropocene Rev 25 238-346