Precautionary Principle and the Optimal Timing of Environmental Policy Under Ambiguity

被引:0
作者
Takao Asano
机构
[1] Okayama University,Faculty of Economics
来源
Environmental and Resource Economics | 2010年 / 47卷
关键词
Ambiguity; Environmental policy; Knightian uncertainty; Non-expected utilities; Precautionary principle; D81; H23; L51; Q23;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
I consider a problem in environmental policy design in which I focus on stock pollutants. In particular, I consider stock pollutants that cause severe damage on the environment and do not depreciate at all once they are released into the atmosphere and the ocean. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to provide an economic foundation for environmental policies based on the precautionary principle and the 1992 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, and (2) to show that this optimal timing rule has a reservation property. Furthermore, I analyze the effect of an increase in ambiguity on the optimal timing of adopting some environmental policy, and show that an increase in ambiguity decreases the optimal timing of adopting the environmental policy.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 196
页数:23
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Arrow KJ(1974)Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility Q J Econ 88 312-319
  • [2] Fisher AC(2006)On precautionary policies Manag Sci 52 1145-1154
  • [3] Barrieu P(1983)Irreversibility, uncertainty, and cyclical investment Q J Econ 98 85-106
  • [4] Sinclair-Desgagne B(2002)Ambiguity, risk and asset returns in continuous time Econometrica 70 1403-1443
  • [5] Bernanke BS(1992)Uncertainty aversion, risk aversion, and the optimal choice of Portfolio Econometrica 60 197-204
  • [6] Chen Z(1961)Risk, ambiguity, and the savage axioms Q J Econ 75 643-669
  • [7] Epstein L(1994)Intertemporal asset pricing under Knightian uncertainty Econometrica 62 283-322
  • [8] Dow J(2004)Differentiating ambiguity and ambiguity attitude J Econ Theory 118 133-173
  • [9] Werlang SRC(1989)Maxmin expected utility with non-unique priors J Math Econ 18 141-153
  • [10] Ellsberg D(2000)Scientific progress and irreversibility: an economic interpretation of the ‘precautionary principle’ J Public Econ 75 229-253