The Multidimensional Poverty Measure among Malaysian Employee Provident Fund (EPF) Retirees

被引:1
作者
Saeed Solaymani
Negin Vaghefi
Fatimah Kari
机构
[1] Arak University,Department of Economics, Faculty of Humanities
[2] Pening Institute,Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Administration
[3] University of Malaya,undefined
来源
Applied Research in Quality of Life | 2019年 / 14卷
关键词
EPF retirees; Multidimensional poverty; Elder; Deprivation; Malaysia;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Assessing poverty using multiple dimensions of deprivation provides a comprehensive picture of poverty. No one factor, like income or any monetary-based indicator is uniquely able to capture all of the factors that contribute to poverty. This study attempts to evaluate the multidimensional poverty measure among Malaysian Employee Provident Fund (EPF) retirees by using Alkire and Foster multidimensional poverty index to a set of deprivation dimensions. The findings indicate that around 84% of EPF retirees were identified as multidimensionally poor, meaning that they are in acute poverty. On average, poor retirees are deprived of 48% of weighted indicators. The results also show that women are more multidimensionally poor compared to men in terms of transportation, income, home ownership and education. The study discovered that Indian retirees are more deprived than other ethnic groups, followed by Malays. In this regard, it is necessary to strengthen current retirement savings institutions to reduce the impacts of the retirement crisis. The government needs to provide a Social Security system that rolls back the decline of Malaysian’s retirement savings.
引用
收藏
页码:1353 / 1371
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]  
Abd Manap N(2017)Investigation of poverty indicators for designing case representation to determine urban poverty Int J Advance Soft Comput Appl 9 90-106
[2]  
Zalmiyah Z(2014)Non-monetary poverty measurement in Malaysia: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah approach Islamic Economic Studies 22 33-46
[3]  
Rohayanti H(2011)Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement Journal of Public Economics 95 476-487
[4]  
Abdul Rasool MS(2013)A multidimensional approach: Poverty measurement & beyond Social Indicators Research 112 239-257
[5]  
Salleh MA(2008)The empirical assessment of multidimensional welfare, inequality and poverty: Sample weighted multivariate generalizations of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov two sample tests for stochastic dominance Journal of Economic Inequality 6 73-87
[6]  
Alkire S(2003)The measurement of multidimensional poverty Journal of Economic Inequality 1 25-49
[7]  
Foster J(2016)The influences of Journal of Rural Studies 47 665-676
[8]  
Alkire S(2014) population and economic growth on Chinese rural Social Indicators Research 116 199-233
[9]  
Santos ME(2014)Layoffs and urban poverty in the state-owned Enterprise communities in Shaanxi Province, China Applied Research in Quality of Life 9 179-195
[10]  
Anderson G(2013)Life satisfaction of the aged in the retirement process: A comparative study of South Korea with Germany and Switzerland Asian Culture and History 5 p48-394