U.S. national parks accessibility and visitation

被引:0
作者
Xing-ju Shen
Rui-hong Huang
Jin-shan Zhang
机构
[1] Southwest Minzu University,College of Historical Culture & Tourism
[2] Northern Arizona University,Department of Geography, Planning, and Recreation
[3] Chinese Academy of Sciences,Key Laboratory of Mountain Hazards and Earth Surface Process, Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment
来源
Journal of Mountain Science | 2019年 / 16卷
关键词
U.S. National Park; Accessibility; Visitation; Distance decay; GIS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Accessibility is a factor affecting national park visitation. However, the effect of accessibility on national park visitation is not fully understood. This paper examines the relationship between U.S. national park visitation and accessibility. First, the global and local accessibility indexes of each park unit are computed based on an accessibility model that takes into account the surrounding population and its proximity to the park unit. Integrated in the model is a distance decay coefficient that is derived from U.S. national park visitor surveys and therefore pertinent to the case of study. Then correlation analysis is performed between park visitation and accessibility based on park types, regions, and visitation types. Results show that total visitation is positively related to accessibility in National Memorials, Military Parks and Battlefield Parks/Sites but negatively related to accessibility in national parks and national monuments. However, recreational overnight stay visits are commonly negatively correlated to accessibility for almost all park types. Moreover, local accessibility index displays enhanced correlation coefficients with improved significance levels in many categories of analysis. Results suggest that historical/cultural national parks which often show positive correlations tend to attract more local visitors, but nature-based parks which mainly show negative correlations tend to attract more distant visitors.
引用
收藏
页码:2894 / 2906
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Bultena GL(1978)Visitors to national parks: A test of the elitism argument Leisure Science 1 395-409
[2]  
Field DR(2009)Nature, race, and parks: Past research and future directions for geographic research Progress in Human Geography 33 743-65
[3]  
Byrne J(2013)A new measure of accessibility based on perceived opportunities Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences 87 117-132
[4]  
Wolch J(1975)A new method for analyzing outdoor recreation data Journal of Leisure Research 7 200-215
[5]  
Cascetta E(1972)A day-use park visitation model Journal of Leisure Research 4 139-156
[6]  
Cartenì A(2005)Whose sacred place? Planning conflict at Cumberland Island National Seashore Historical Geography 33 202-224
[7]  
Montaninoa M(2003)Destination competitiveness: Determinants and indicators Current Issues in Tourism 6 369-414
[8]  
Cesario FJ(1999)Race, ethnicity and use of the nationalpark system Social Science Research Review 1 1-23
[9]  
Cheung HK(2002)Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele Leisure Sciences 24 143-159
[10]  
Dilsaver L(1999)Distance effects in the demand for wildland recreational services: The Case of National Parks in the United States Environmental and Planning Annals 31 477-492