Application of the Regional Flood Frequency Analysis to the Upper and Lower Basins of the Indus River, Pakistan

被引:0
作者
Zamir Hussain
机构
[1] Bahauddin Zakariya University,Department of Statistics
来源
Water Resources Management | 2011年 / 25卷
关键词
Indus river; L-moments; Partial probability weighted moments; Regional frequency analysis; Ward’s clustering method;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The paper presents results of an application of the L-moments based regional flood frequency analysis to annual maximum peak (AMP) flows observed at seven stations (Tarbela, Kalabagh, Chashma, Taunsa, Guddu, Sukkur and Kotri) located on the main stream of the Indus River, Pakistan. The results of Run-test and lag-1 correlation coefficient showed that the data series at given sites is random and has no serious serial correlations respectively. Furthermore, the results of Grubbs and Beck test illustrated that there are no irregularities (abrupt variations) except low outlier(s) in the data series at various sites. To avoid their undue influence, these low outliers have been discarded and the sample information has been re-summarized using the idea of left censored type A′ partial probability weighted moments. L-moments based regional heterogeneity measure (H) showed that the region, defined by seven stations, is heterogeneous; therefore, it has been sub-divided into two homogeneous regions (Region 1 and Region 2 consist of four (Tarbela, Kalabagh, Chashma and Taunsa) and three sites (Guddu, Sukkur and Kotri, respectively) using Ward’s clustering method based on the site characteristics only. The results of various goodness-of-fit measures (L-moment ratio diagram, average weighted distance and ZDIST measures) showed that Region 1 has four candidates: generalized normal (GNO), generalized logistic (GLO), generalized extreme-value (GEV) and Pearson type III (PE3), while Region 2 has only one candidate; GLO, as regional distribution. Based on the results of different accuracy measures (regional average absolute relative bias, relative bias and relative root mean square error) of the estimated regional growth curves and quantiles, obtained from simulation experiments, PE3 is the robust distribution for Region 1, while for Region 2, GLO distribution can be used for the estimation of flood quantiles. Moreover, the results of the simulations study have been extended to obtain standard errors of the estimated quantiles at each site of the sub-divided homogeneous regions.
引用
收藏
页码:2797 / 2822
页数:25
相关论文
共 89 条
[11]  
Chernoff H(1996)Low-flow analysis with a conditional Weibull tail model Water Resour Res 32 1749-1760
[12]  
Gastwirth JL(1996)Regionalization of low-flow frequency estimates: an Alabama case study Water Resour Bull 32 23-37
[13]  
Johns MV(2001)Control charts based on linear combinations of order statistics J Appl Statist 28 457-468
[14]  
Cunnane C(2007)Maximum monthly rainfall analysis using L-moments for an Arid Region in Isfahan Province, Iran J Appl Meteorol Climatol 46 494-503
[15]  
David HA(1997)Consensus clustering of U.S. temperature and precipitation data J Climatol 10 1405-1430
[16]  
Dinpashoh Y(1979)Probability weighted moments: definition and relation to parameters of several distributions expressible in inverse form Water Resour Res 15 1049-1054
[17]  
Fakheri-Fard A(1996)Presentation and review of some methods for regional flood frequency analysis J Hydrol 186 63-84
[18]  
Moghaddam M(1996)Inter-comparison of regional flood frequency procedures for Canadian rivers J Hydrol 186 85-103
[19]  
Jahanbakhsh S(1972)Extension of sample sizes and percentage points for significance tests of outlying observations Technometrics 14 847-854
[20]  
Mirnia M(1993)Regional precipitation of quantile values for the continental United States computed from L-moments J Climate 6 2326-2340