Social sustainability in supply chain decisions: Indian manufacturers

被引:0
作者
Amrinder Kaur
Puja Chhabra Sharma
机构
[1] Ansal University,
来源
Environment, Development and Sustainability | 2018年 / 20卷
关键词
Sustainability; Social sustainability; Supply chain management; Strategy; Indian manufacturers;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of the paper is to assess the inclusion of social sustainability in the decisions of supply chain in multinational manufacturing organisations in India. Indian organisations are resorting to sustainability-based reporting for greater transparency and for creation of brand value for their organisations. There are tremendous economic upheavals and changes across the complete value chain, and thus, responsible business practices are becoming a necessity for the long-term survival of organisations. Sustainability, as a strategy, is responsible utilisation of resources and is reported through social, economic and environmental factors in an organisation. For sustainability as a strategy, there has to be a complete organisational inclusion and employee engagement through decision making at operational levels along the value chain. The research paper is an empirical study done through a survey using a structured questionnaire to collect information to evaluate decision criteria particularly for social sustainability, from the middle and top level executives in Indian manufacturing organisations. Multinational manufacturing organisations in India are trying to be more responsible because of mandated CSR policy, and thus, sustainability through social factors is getting more prominence. A multiple linear regression analysis is used to explain the correlation and inclusion of social factors on the decision-making process in the supply chain of multinational manufacturing organisations in India. This study reveals that decision making in the supply chain of multinational manufacturing organisations in India specifically in manufacturing industry is incorporating social sustainability. The study highlights that decision making involving social sustainability needs larger frameworks for organisational preference. While the study provides evidence of social sustainability-based practices in multinational manufacturing organisations in India, it does not deal with social sustainability practices. The study also has limitation as has been limited to organisations which follow sustainability practices and make disclosures through GRI framework.
引用
收藏
页码:1707 / 1721
页数:14
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Ahi P(2016)A comprehensive multidimensional framework for assessing the performance of sustainable supply chains Applied Mathematical Modelling 40 10153-10166
  • [2] Jaber MY(2013)A comparative literature analysis of definitions for green and Sustainable supply chain management Journal of Cleaner Production 52 329-341
  • [3] Searcy C(2012)‘Making connections: A review of supply chain management and sustainability literature. Supply chain management An International Journal 17 497-516
  • [4] Ahi P(2007)Social sustainability and social acceptance in technology assessment: a case study of energy technologies Technology in Society 29 63-78
  • [5] Searcy C(2007)Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility Academy of Management Review 32 946-967
  • [6] Ashby A(2008)A framework of sustainable supply chain management: moving toward new theory International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 38 360-387
  • [7] Leat M(2014)A framework for sustainable performance assessment of supply chain management practices Computers & Industrial Engineering 76 138-147
  • [8] Hudson-Smith M(2012)Big brand sustainability: Governance prospects and environmental limits Global Environmental change Elsevier 1 36-45
  • [9] Assefa G(2002)Beyond the business case for Corporate Sustainability Business Strategy and the Environment 11 130-141
  • [10] Frostell B(2006)‘Sustainability assessment: Basic components of a practical approach Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 24 170-182