Flood susceptibility mapping by best–worst and logistic regression methods in Mersin, Turkey

被引:0
|
作者
Bilal Özay
Osman Orhan
机构
[1] Mersin University,Department of Geomatics, Engineering Faculty
关键词
Flood susceptibility mapping; Disaster management; GIS; Flood inventory map; Best–worst method; Logistic regression;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Flood disasters resulting from excessive water in stream beds inflict extensive damage. Floods are caused by the expansion of cities, the erosion of riverbeds, inadequate infrastructure, and increasing precipitation due to climate change. Floods cause great damage to agricultural areas and settlements. Regions that may be affected by floods should be identified, and precautions should be taken in these areas to prevent these damages. Flood susceptibility maps are produced for this reason. The purpose of this study was to construct a flood susceptibility map so that susceptible locations in Mersin may be identified. Firstly, 429 flood events were identified for the flood inventory map. Twelve conditioning factors, namely elevation, slope, distance to river, distance to drainage, drainage density, soil permeability, precipitation, land cover/land use, stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), aspect, and curvature were used to create flood susceptibility maps, applying logistic regression and best–worst methods. The flood inventory data were used to prepare susceptibility maps and test their consistency. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used for consistency analysis. In logistic regression, 86% of floods were located within 20% of the study area that was categorized as high and very high susceptibility. According to the value of the area under the ROC curve (AUC), logistic regression had a 0.901 value. Land use, soil permeability, and elevation were the most important factors in the logistic regression method. In the best–worst method, 85% of floods were located within the 14% of the study area categorized as high and very high susceptibility. According to the AUC value, the best–worst method had a 0.898 value. Elevation, distance to river, and precipitation factors had the highest coefficient value in the best–worst method. Based on the AUC values, the flood susceptibility maps had a high prediction capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:45151 / 45170
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Evaluation of environmental parameters in logistic regression models for landslide susceptibility mapping
    Suzen, Mehmet Lutfi
    Kaya, Basak Sener
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DIGITAL EARTH, 2012, 5 (04) : 338 - 355
  • [32] Binary Logistic Regression applied to erosion susceptibility mapping in the Southern Amazon
    da Fonseca, Elaine Lima
    da Silva Filho, Eliomar Pereira
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE GEOMORFOLOGIA, 2023, 24 (04)
  • [33] Landslide susceptibility mapping on a global scale using the method of logistic regression
    Lin, Le
    Lin, Qigen
    Wang, Ying
    NATURAL HAZARDS AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2017, 17 (08) : 1411 - 1424
  • [34] Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression
    Nandi, Arpita
    Mandal, Arpita
    Wilson, Matthew
    Smith, David
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2016, 75 (06)
  • [35] Flood hazard mapping in Jamaica using principal component analysis and logistic regression
    Arpita Nandi
    Arpita Mandal
    Matthew Wilson
    David Smith
    Environmental Earth Sciences, 2016, 75
  • [36] The spatial distribution of liquefaction susceptibility by logistic regression model adapted for Adapazari, Turkey
    Mert A.C.
    Arel E.
    Önalp A.
    Teknik Dergi/Technical Journal of Turkish Chamber of Civil Engineers, 2020, 31 (02): : 9851 - 9868
  • [37] Application of logistic regression for landslide susceptibility zoning of Cekmece Area, Istanbul, Turkey
    Duman, T. Y.
    Can, T.
    Gokceoglu, C.
    Nefeslioglu, H. A.
    Sonmez, H.
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2006, 51 (02): : 241 - 256
  • [38] The Spatial Distribution of Liquefaction Susceptibility by Logistic Regression Model Adapted for Adapazari, Turkey
    Mert, Ahmet Can
    Arel, Ersin
    Onalp, Akin
    TEKNIK DERGI, 2020, 31 (02): : 9851 - 9868
  • [39] Running a best-subsets logistic regression: An alternative to stepwise methods
    King, JE
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2003, 63 (03) : 392 - 403
  • [40] Comparison between Different Distributed Methods for Flood Susceptibility Mapping
    Lorena Liuzzo
    Vincenzo Sammartano
    Gabriele Freni
    Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 : 3155 - 3173