Comparative Phloem Chemistry of Manchurian (Fraxinus mandshurica) and Two North American Ash Species (Fraxinus americana and Fraxinus pennsylvanica)

被引:0
作者
Alieta Eyles
William Jones
Ken Riedl
Don Cipollini
Steven Schwartz
Kenneth Chan
Daniel A. Herms
Pierluigi Bonello
机构
[1] The Ohio State University,Department of Plant Pathology
[2] The Ohio State University,Division Of Pharmaceutics, College Of Pharmacy
[3] The Ohio State University,Department of Food Science and Technology, 110 Parker Food Science
[4] Wright State University,Department of Biological Sciences
[5] The Ohio State University/Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center,Department Of Entomology
[6] Cooperative Research Centre for Forestry,undefined
来源
Journal of Chemical Ecology | 2007年 / 33卷
关键词
LC-MS; Hydroxycoumarins; Phenolics; Coevolution; Host resistance; Invasive species;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Recent studies have investigated interspecific variation in resistance of ash (Fraxinus spp.) to the exotic wood-boring beetle, emerald ash borer (EAB, Agrilus planipennis). Manchurian ash (Fraxinus mandshurica) is an Asian species that has coevolved with EAB. It experiences little EAB-induced mortality compared to North American ashes. Host phloem chemistry, both constitutive and induced, might partly explain this interspecific variation in resistance. We analyzed the constitutive phloem chemistry of three ash species: Manchurian ash and North American white (Fraxinus americana) and green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) ash. Analysis of the crude phloem extracts revealed the presence of an array of phenolic compounds including hydroxycoumarins, a monolignol, lignans, phenylethanoids, and secoiridoids. Both qualitative and quantitative differences were observed among the three ash species. Hydroxycoumarins and the phenylethanoids, calceloariosides A and B, were present only in the phloem of Manchurian ash and might represent a mechanism of resistance against EAB.
引用
收藏
页码:1430 / 1448
页数:18
相关论文
共 254 条
[1]  
Adler L. S.(1995)Genetic variation in defensive chemistry in Oecologia 101 75-85
[2]  
Schmitt J.(1944) (Plantaginaceae) and its effect on the specialist herbivore Junonia coenia (Nymphalidae) J. Econ. Entomol. 37 588-596
[3]  
Bowers M. D.(2001)The relation between host condition and attacks by the bronzed birch borer Anal. Lett. 34 1033-1051
[4]  
Anderson R. F.(2004)Analysis by HPLC-MS/MS of biophenolic components in olives and oils Oecologia 140 430-441
[5]  
Bianco A.(1984)Plant chemical defense against herbivores and pathogens: generalized defense or trade-offs? Can. J. For. Res. 14 351-356
[6]  
Buiarelli F.(1997)Discussion-response of bark tissues to injury and infection Pharmazie 52 386-391
[7]  
Cartoni G.(1989)Isolation and receptor binding properties of alkaloids and lignans from Valeriana officinalis L Annu. Prev. Phytopathol. 27 343-371
[8]  
Coccioli F.(2005)Perspectives on wound healing in resistance to pathogens Phytochem. Anal. 16 375-379
[9]  
Muzzalupo I.(1999)Lignans and secoiridoids from the root bark of Fitoterapia 70 561-567
[10]  
Polidori A.(2005) L.: isolation, identification and HPLC analysis Am. Entomol. 51 152-165