Energy and environmental analysis of a rapeseed biorefinery conversion process

被引:0
作者
Alessio Boldrin
Alberto Balzan
Thomas Astrup
机构
[1] Technical University of Denmark,Department of Environmental Engineering
关键词
Rapeseed; Biofuel; Biorefinery; LCA; Enzymes;
D O I
10.1007/s13399-013-0071-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The need for biofuels is steadily increasing as a result of political strategies and the need for energy security. Biorefineries have the potential to improve the sustainability of biofuels through further recovery of valuable bioproducts and bioenergy. A life cycle assessment (LCA)-based environmental assessment of a Danish biorefinery system was carried out to thoroughly analyze and optimize the concept and address future research. The LCA study was based on case-specific mass and energy balances and inventory data, and was conducted using consequential LCA approach to take into account market mechanisms determining the fate of products, lost opportunities and marginal productions. The results show that introduction of enzymatic transesterification and improved oil extraction procedure result in environmental benefits compared to a traditional process. Utilization of rapeseed straw seems to have positive effects on the greenhouse gases (GHG) footprint of the biorefinery system, with improvements in the range of 9 % to 29 %, depending on the considered alternative. The mass and energy balances showed the potential for improvement of straw treatment processes (hydrothermal pre-treatment and dark fermentation) as well as minor issues related to enzymes utilization in different bio-processes.
引用
收藏
页码:127 / 141
页数:14
相关论文
共 130 条
[1]  
Directive EC(2009)/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC Official Journal of the European Union 140 16-45
[2]  
Cherubini F(2010)LCA of a biorefinery concept producing bioethanol, bioenergy, and chemicals from switchgrass Int J Life Cycle Assess 15 53-66
[3]  
Jungmeier G(2008)Comparative life cycle assessment of two biofuels. Ethanol from sugar beet and rapeseed methyl ester Int J LCA 13 184-190
[4]  
Halleux H(2009)Environmental impacts of a lignocellulose feedstock biorefinery system: an assessment Biomass Bioenergy 33 793-802
[5]  
Lassaux S(2010)Crop residues as raw materials for biorefinery systems—a LCA case study Applied Energy 87 47-57
[6]  
Renzoni R(2010)Can rape seed biodiesel meet the European Union Sustainability Criteria for biofuels? Energy Fuel 24 1720-1730
[7]  
Germain A(2008)Life cycle assessment of an advanced bioethanol technology in the perspective of constrained biomass availability Env Sci Technol 42 7992-7999
[8]  
Uihlein A(2009)Global environmental consequences of increased biodiesel consumption in Switzerland: consequential life cycle assessment J Clean Prod 17 S46-S56
[9]  
Schebek L(2009)Life-cycle assessment of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of soybean-derived biodiesel and renewable fuels Env Sc Tech 43 750-756
[10]  
Cherubini F(2006)A life-cycle comparison between inorganic and biological catalysis for the production of biodiesel J Clean Prod 16 1368-1378