Farmers and researchers: How can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?

被引:0
作者
Volker Hoffmann
Kirsten Probst
Anja Christinck
机构
[1] University of Hohenheim (430A),Agricultural Extension and Communication
[2] German Agency for Technical Cooperation,undefined
来源
Agriculture and Human Values | 2007年 / 24卷
关键词
Innovation systems; Knowledge systems; Participatory research; Technology development;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article examines differences in the research approaches of farmers and scientists and analyzes how these differences are related to the conditions under which both groups engage in experimental work. Theoretical considerations as well as practical experiences are presented to emphasize the great potential of farmer–researcher collaboration for rural innovation. In the first part of the article, the innovative power of farmer research and experimentation is acknowledged by presenting examples such as crop and animal breeding, development of new production systems, farm equipment, and social innovations. Considering the respective comparative advantages of farmers and scientists, and inspired by theoretical concepts in the fields of knowledge management and innovation processes, we discuss five topics for optimizing the collaboration between farmers and scientists in the field of technological innovation: user orientation, decentralization, informal modes of experimentation, externalization of tacit knowledge, and economic considerations. A better understanding of such issues could help researchers to define their own role in the research process, acknowledge the strengths and weaknesses of their own and farmers’ research approaches, overcome communication gaps, and find creative solutions for problems that typically occur in the process of participatory technology development.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 368
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Bentley J. W.(1989)What farmers don’t know can’t help them: The strengths and weaknesses of indigenous technical knowledge in Honduras Agriculture and Human Values 6 25-31
[2]  
Bentley J. W.(1994)Facts, fantasies, and failures of farmer participatory research Agriculture and Human Values 11 140-150
[3]  
Bentley J. W.(2001)Honduran folk entomology Current Anthropology 42 285-301
[4]  
Rodriguez G.(1981)Sources of innovation in agricultural technology World Development 9 321-326
[5]  
Biggs S.(2000)Grassroots innovations for survival ILEIA Newsletter for Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA) 16 5-6
[6]  
Clay E. J.(2000)This is my own innovation: The history of Limpo grass ILEIA Newsletter for Low External Input and Sustainable Agriculture (LEISA) 16 31-32
[7]  
Gupta A.(1967)African traditional thought and western science. Part I: From tradition to science. Part II: The closed and opened predicaments Africa 37 50-71
[8]  
Hocdé H.(1979)Indigenous technical knowledge: Analysis, implications and issues Institute of Development Studies (IDS) Bulletin 2 5-11
[9]  
Chacón M.(1972)Individuality and experimentation in traditional agriculture Human Ecology 1 149-159
[10]  
Horton R.(2002)Theoretical streams in marginalized peoples’ knowledge(s): Systems, asystems, and subaltern knowledge(s) Agriculture and Human Values 19 225-237