Role of protein structure and the role of individual fingers in zinc finger protein–DNA recognition: a molecular dynamics simulation study and free energy calculations

被引:0
作者
Mazen Y. Hamed
机构
[1] Birzeit University,Chemistry Department
来源
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design | 2018年 / 32卷
关键词
Zinc finger; DNA binding; Protein; Specificity; Binding energy; Mutants; Molecular dynamics;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Molecular dynamics and MM_GBSA energy calculations on various zinc finger proteins containing three and four fingers bound to their target DNA gave insights into the role of each finger in the DNA binding process as part of the protein structure. The wild type Zif 268 (PDB code: 1AAY) gave a ΔG value of − 76.1 (14) kcal/mol. Zinc fingers ZF1, ZF2 and ZF3 were mutated in one experiment and in another experiment one finger was cut and the rest of the protein was studied for binding. The ΔΔG values for the Zinc Finger protein with both ZF1 and ZF2 mutated was + 80 kcal/mol, while mutating only ZF1 the ΔΔG value was + 52 kcal/mol (relative to the wild type). Cutting ZF3 and studying the protein consisting only of ZF1 linked to ZF2 gave a ΔΔG value of + 68 kcal/mol. Upon cutting ZF1, the resulting ZF2 linked to ZF3 protein gave a ΔΔG value of + 41 kcal/mol. The above results shed light on the importance of each finger in the binding process, especially the role of ZF1 as the anchoring finger followed in importance by ZF2 and ZF3. The energy difference between the binding of the wild type protein Zif268 (1AAY) and that for individual finger binding to DNA according to the formula: ΔΔGlinkers, otherstructuralfactors = ΔGzif268 − (ΔGF1+F2+F3) gave a value = − 44.5 kcal/mol. This stabilization can be attributed to the contribution of linkers and other structural factors in the intact protein in the DNA binding process. DNA binding energies of variant proteins of the wild type Zif268 which differ in their ZF1 amino acid sequence gave evidence of a good relationship between binding energy and recognition and specificity, this finding confirms the reported vital role of ZF1 in the ZF protein scanning and anchoring to the target DNA sequence. The role of hydrogen bonds in both specific and nonspecific amino acid-DNA contacts is discussed in relation to mutations. The binding energies of variant Zinc Finger proteins confirmed the role of ZF1 in the recognition, specificity and anchoring of the zinc finger protein to DNA.
引用
收藏
页码:657 / 669
页数:12
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Wu H(1995)Building zinc fingers by selection: toward a therapeutic application Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 92 344-348
  • [2] Yang WP(1998)High-resolution structures of variant Zif268–DNA complexes: implications for understanding zinc finger–DNA recognition Structure 6 451-464
  • [3] Barbas CF(2010)Cooperativity and specificity of Cys2His2 zinc finger protein-DNA interactions: a molecular dynamics simulation study J Phys Chem B 114 7662-7671
  • [4] Elrod-Erickson M(1997)Selection of peptides that functionally replace a zinc finger in the Sp1 transcription factor by using a yeast combinatorial library Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94 14120-14125
  • [5] Benson TE(2005)Development of zinc finger domains for recognition of the 5′-CNN-3′ family DNA sequences and their use in the construction of artificial transcription factors J Biol Chem 280 35588-35597
  • [6] Pabo CO(1997)A general strategy for selecting high-affinity zinc finger proteins for diverse DNA target sites Science 275 657-661
  • [7] Lee J(2016)Zinc finger protein binding to DNA: an energy perspective using molecular dynamics simulation and free energy calculations on mutants of both zinc finger domains and their specific DNA bases J Biomol Struct Dyn 34 919-934
  • [8] Kim J-S(2004)From sequence to structure and back again: approaches for predicting protein-DNA binding Proteome Sci 2 3-1180
  • [9] Seok C(1996)Zif268 protein-DNA complex refined at 1.6 A: a model system for understanding zinc finger-DNA interactions Structure 4 1171-38
  • [10] Cheng X(2009)Zinc finger database (ZiFDB): a repository for information on C Nucleic Acids Res 366 27-562