Large-Eddy Simulation of the Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layer using Dynamic Models with Different Averaging Schemes

被引:0
作者
Rob Stoll
Fernando Porté-Agel
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,Saint Anthony Falls Laboratory, Department of Civil Engineering
[2] National Center for Earth-Surface Dynamics,undefined
来源
Boundary-Layer Meteorology | 2008年 / 126卷
关键词
Atmospheric boundary layer; Dynamic subgrid-scale model; Large-eddy simulation; Stable boundary layer;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Large-eddy simulation (LES) of a stable atmospheric boundary layer is performed using recently developed dynamic subgrid-scale (SGS) models. These models not only calculate the Smagorinsky coefficient and SGS Prandtl number dynamically based on the smallest resolved motions in the flow, they also allow for scale dependence of those coefficients. This dynamic calculation requires statistical averaging for numerical stability. Here, we evaluate three commonly used averaging schemes in stable atmospheric boundary-layer simulations: averaging over horizontal planes, over adjacent grid points, and following fluid particle trajectories. Particular attention is focused on assessing the effect of the different averaging methods on resolved flow statistics and SGS model coefficients. Our results indicate that averaging schemes that allow the coefficients to fluctuate locally give results that are in better agreement with boundary-layer similarity theory and previous LES studies. Even among models that are local, the averaging method is found to affect model coefficient probability density function distributions and turbulent spectra of the resolved velocity and temperature fields. Overall, averaging along fluid pathlines is found to produce the best combination of self consistent model coefficients, first- and second-order flow statistics and insensitivity to grid resolution.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 28
页数:27
相关论文
共 167 条
[21]  
Khairoutdinov M(1995)A dynamic localization model for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows J Fluid Mech 286 229-261
[22]  
Kosovic B(2005)Large-eddy simulations of the stable boundary layer using the standard kolmogorov theory: range of applicability Boundary-Layer Meteorol 115 241-309
[23]  
Lewellen D(1973)Turbulence, spectra, length scales and structure parameters in the stable surface layer Boundary-Layer Meteorol 4 289-589
[24]  
Lund TS(1972)Spectral characteristics of surface-layer turbulence Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 98 563-794
[25]  
Lundquist JK(2001)Sensitivity of modelled antarctic climate to surface and boundary-layer flux parametrizations Quart J Roy Meteorol Soc 127 779-546
[26]  
McCabe A(2006)On the application of the dynamic Smagorinsky model to large-eddy simulations of cloud-topped atmospheric boundary layer J Atmos Sci 63 526-2388
[27]  
Moene AF(2003)On the magnitude and variability of subgrid-scale eddy-diffusion coefficients in the atmospheric surface layer J Atmos Sci 60 2372-2307
[28]  
Noh Y(2004)Field experimental study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in the atmospheric surface layer J Atmos Sci 61 2296-1068
[29]  
Raasch S(2006)Numerical study of dynamic Smagorinsky models in large-eddy simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: validation in stable and unstable conditions Water Resour Res 42 W06D10-635
[30]  
Sullivan P(2000)A large-eddy simulation study of a quasi-steady, stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer J Atmos Sci 57 1052-26