Application of Artificial Neural Network to Evaluate Coalbed Methane Exploration Potential: A Case Study from Permian Longtan Formation, Shuicheng, Guizhou

被引:0
作者
Debashish Mondal
Sijie Han
Shuxun Sang
Xiaozhi Zhou
Fuping Zhao
Wei Gao
Peiming Zhou
Jinchao Zhang
Ang Xu
机构
[1] China University of Mining and Technology,School of Resources and Earth Sciences
[2] China University of Mining and Technology,Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process of the Ministry of Education
[3] China University of Mining and Technology,Carbon Neutrality Institute
[4] China University of Mining and Technology,Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Coal
[5] Ministry of Natural Resources,Based Greenhouse Gas Control and Utilization
[6] Guizhou Engineering Institute of Oil and Gas Exploration and Development,Key Laboratory of Unconventional Natural Gas Evaluation and Development in Complex Tectonic Areas
[7] Guizhou Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Coalbed Methane and Shale Gas,Department of Geology and Mining
[8] University of Rajshahi,undefined
来源
Natural Resources Research | 2024年 / 33卷
关键词
Coalbed methane; 3D model; Exploration potential; Artificial neural network; Shuicheng; Guizhou;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Shuicheng area in Guizhou (China) contains extensive coalbed methane (CBM) resources in the Permian Longtan Formation and it has high potential for large-scale exploration and development. However, exploration and development have started in a few areas in these regions. Evaluating CBM exploration potential (EP) areas is crucial for efficient exploration. Using an artificial neural network (ANN) model, this research established a CBM EP model for evaluating prospective areas in the Dahebian, Shenxianpo, and Tudiya CBM blocks. Thirty-four coal seams exist in the research area, with coal seams 01# and 07# highly developed exclusively in Dahebian and Shenxianpo blocks, coal seams 09#, 11#, 12#, 13#, and 14# throughout the three blocks, and coal seam 25# in the southern portion of Tudiya blocks. The coal seam 11# is the thickest (0.2–11.48 m), with buried depth of 102–1522 m, and is characterized by a wide range of properties variation: low- to high-rank coal (Ro% 0.6–2.5), gas content range of 0.43–20.12 m3/t, and weak to highly deformed by a string of normal and reverse faults. Considering six key evaluation parameters (thickness, buried depth, gas content, rank, structural and roof sealing conditions), an EP model was developed, and the analytic hierarchy process membership function and pairwise comparison matrix were used to calculate the weight of each parameter. A mathematical model has determined the comprehensive CBM EP coefficient and the evaluation scores ranged 0–1; the high scores represent high CBM EP. In total, 101,965 data points of the six input neurons and one target neuron were extracted from the 3D parameter model and the result of the EP model, respectively, and were used to train the ANN model. The model performed high accuracy based on R and R2 and minimum mean square error and root mean square error. The results reflect that the model construction was 99% accurate, and the established EP model in this study was also 99% precise and adequate for evaluating the favorable areas for exploration. The results show that the EP values of > 0.8 represents medium to thick coal seam, weakly deformed medium-rank coal having high gas content and buried within 600–1200 m. The EP values of 0.65–0.8 indicate medium thick, medium to high-rank coal with weak-moderately deformed coal having a depth range of 400–1200 m. In areas with EP values of < 0.65, coal seams are thin, highly deformed, middle to high-rank coal with medium to high gas content and < 400 and > 1200 m buried depth. Two very high-potential (VHP), three high-potential, and two medium-potential areas were identified; among them, VHP-1 in the Biandanwan area had the most significant potential, which is supported by CBM development data. This model can significantly impact successful CBM exploration and development of complex geological settings areas in the Guizhou province in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 636
页数:27
相关论文
共 221 条
[1]  
Baowen W(2010)CBM geological condition and exploitation potential in Shuicheng Mining Area, Guizhou Coal Geology of China 22 28-31
[2]  
Yong I(2017)Analysis of coalbed methane reservoir characteristics and reconstruction process in Shuicheng Mining Area Coal Science and Technology 45 182-187
[3]  
Di G(1995)Basic types of coal seam faults and their effect on controlling gas outburst zone Journal of China Coal Society 20 413-417
[4]  
Caiqin B(2019)The impact of depositional environment and tectonic evolution on coalbed methane occurrence in West Henan, China International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 29 297-305
[5]  
Huanpeng C(2012)Magma thermal metamorphism of the Longtan formation coals in Zhijin Guizhou Journal of China University of Mining and Technology 41 406-414
[6]  
Yansheng S(2009)CBM geology and exploring-developing stratagem in Guizhou Province China. Procedia Earth and Planetary Science 1 882-887
[7]  
Cao Y(2019)The evaluation of potential for the exploration and development of coalbed methane resources based on an improved uncertainty measure optimization model Energy Exploration & Exploitation 37 315-331
[8]  
Peng L(2015)Study on enrichment condition and reservoir formation model of coalbed methane in the middle of the southern of the Southern Junggar Basin Coal Science and Technology 43 94-98
[9]  
Cao Z(2016)Geological characteristics and CBM exploration potential evaluation: A case study in the middle of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 30 557-570
[10]  
Lin B(2017)Preliminary research on CBM enrichment models of low-rank coal and its geological controls: a case study in the middle of the southern Junggar Basin, NW China Marine and Petroleum Geology 83 97-110