The evolution of South Korea’s innovation system: moving towards the triple helix model?

被引:0
作者
Jungwon Yoon
机构
[1] Sogang University,Graduate School of Technology Management
来源
Scientometrics | 2015年 / 104卷
关键词
Co-patent; Innovation systems; Triple helix; University-industry-government relations; Collaboration network; South Korea;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The South Korea’s innovation system has been transformed in tandem with rapid economic growth over the last three decades. In order to explore the evolution process of the innovation system in Korea, this study examines the trends and patterns in collaboration activities among the triple helix actors, such as university, industry, and government (UIG), using co-patent data. The triple helix framework is employed to analyze innovation dynamics within the networks of the bi- and trilateral relations embedded in patent collaborations. The analyses focus on how the triple helix dynamics have been shaped and transformed in the course of development of the innovation system. The results reveal that collaboration activities among UIG largely increased across three developmental phases from 1980 to 2012. In the early periods, strategic R&D alliances between industry and government sector were set up to strengthen enterprises’ innovation capabilities. When the Korean large conglomerates, Chaebols, became a dominant driver of domestic innovation activities, the primary agents of the collaborations shifted from industry-government to industry-university. The network analysis shows that university-industry collaboration is the strongest within the triple helix in recent years, followed by industry-government relations and then UIG relations. The tripartite collaboration has emerged with the rise of entrepreneur universities, but its network has rather been weak and inactive. While Korea has experienced a transition from statist model to a triple helix, the full-fledged triple helix model has not been established yet.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 293
页数:28
相关论文
共 103 条
[1]  
Carlsson B(2002)Innovation systems: Analytical and methodological issues Research Policy 31 233-245
[2]  
Jacobsson S(1991)On the nature, function and composition of technological systems Journal of Evolutionary Economics 1 93-118
[3]  
Holmen M(2011)Mapping of biotechnology patents of China from 1995–2008 Scientometrics 88 73-89
[4]  
Rickne A(2013)The patterns and propensity for international co-invention: The case of China Scientometrics 94 481-495
[5]  
Carlsson B(2014)Quantifying the triple helix relationship in scientific research: Statistical analyses on the dividing pattern between developed and developing countries Quality and Quantity 22 485-491
[6]  
Stankiewicz R(2002)Building a national innovation system through regional innovation systems Technovation 8 159-171
[7]  
Chen Z(1996)The new wave of regional innovation networks: Analysis, characteristics and strategy Small Business Economics 42 293-337
[8]  
Guan J(2003)Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations Social Science Information 24 14-23
[9]  
Chen JH(2007)The triple helix model of innovation Asia Pacific Tech Monitor 29 109-123
[10]  
Jang SL(2000)The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and “Mode 2” to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations Research Policy 35 1329-1346