A novel system for the automatic reconstruction of visual field based on eye tracking and machine learning

被引:0
作者
Eduardo A. Martínez-González
Alfonso Alba
Edgar Arce-Santana
Jorge Fernández-Wong
Martin O. Mendez
机构
[1] Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí,Facultad de Ciencias
[2] Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí,Laboratorio Nacional CI3M
[3] Hospital de Especialidades Médicas de la Salud,undefined
来源
Multimedia Tools and Applications | 2023年 / 82卷
关键词
Machine learning; Eye movement perimetry; Eye tracker; Visual field assessment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Eye movement perimetry (EMP) is a paradigm developed to assess the visual field without the necessity of suppressing the natural eye movements during the test. Unlike the standard automated perimetry (SAP) where the patient’s responses are recorded using a button, EMP uses the natural eye movements reflex as responses during the evaluation. The reliability of EMP depends on correctly determining whether a stimulus is seen or not which, in turn, depends on an adequate analysis of the eye movement data. However, many studies in EMP have focused on characterizing eye movements and only a few authors have documented their methods to determine whether a peripheral stimulus was seen during the test. Furthermore, many of them use static thresholds to perform the classification, but it is not clear how these threshold values were obtained. Based on the foregoing, we develop a threshold test based on FASTPAC C24-2 and EMP for the visual field assessment. Our method uses two machine learning techniques: (1) cascaded K-Means and Bayesian classifiers (KBC) and (2) an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) to classify whether a stimulus was seen or not. Our method was validated with twenty healthy participants (13 women and 7 men) aged 19–43 years (µ = 26 ± 5 years), where the participants performed both an EMP test and an SAP emulation test. Results were compared with gaze trajectories annotations performed by an expert, obtaining accuracy values between 96.8% and 98.9% for KBC and ANN, and values between 90.5% and 92% for SAP emulation.
引用
收藏
页码:27193 / 27215
页数:22
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Jernigan ME(1980)Structural analysis of eye movement responses to visual field stimuli Comput Biol Med 10 11-22
  • [2] Johnson CA(1988)Fatigue effects in automated perimetry Appl Opt 27 1030-1037
  • [3] Adams CW(2020)An open-source static threshold perimetry test using remote eye-tracking (eyecatcher): description, validation and preliminary normative data Trans Vis Sci Tech 9 18-1725
  • [4] Lewis RA(1986)Visual fixation stability in older adults Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 27 1720-441
  • [5] Jones PR(2020)Developing a visual perimetry test based on eye-tracking: proof of concept Health Technol 10 437-2026
  • [6] Kosnik W(2019)Effect of age, sex, stimulus intensity, and eccentricity on saccadic reaction time in eye movement perimetry Trans Vis Sci Tech 8 13-undefined
  • [7] Fikre J(2017)Comparison of threshold Saccadic Vector Optokinetic Perimetry (SVOP) and standard automated perimetry (SAP) in Glaucoma. Part II: patterns of Visual Field loss and acceptability Trans Vis Sci Tech 6 4-undefined
  • [8] Sekuler R(2009)Feasibility of saccadic vector optokinetic perimetry: a method of automated static perimetry for children using eye tracking Ophthalmology 116 2017-undefined
  • [9] Martínez-González EA(2013)Validity and repeatability of saccadic response times across the visual field in eye movement perimetry Trans Vis Sci Tech 2 3-undefined
  • [10] Alba A(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined