Gastric and Enteral Access for Feeding in Critically Ill Patients

被引：0

作者：

Hu D. ^{[1
,2
]}

Huang S. ^{[2
]}

Sheth R.A. ^{[2
,3
]}

机构：

[1] Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX

[2] Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

[3] Department of Interventional Radiology, T. Boone Pickens Academic Tower (FCT14.5092), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Unit 1471, Houston, 77030, TX

来源：

Current Trauma Reports | 2017年 / 3卷 / 3期

关键词：

Gastrojejunostomy; Gastrostomy; Jejunostomy; Naso/oral-gastric; Nutrition; Percutaneous access;

D O I：

10.1007/s40719-017-0103-1

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Purpose of Review: The purpose of this study is to review recent advancements, trends, and recommendations in gastric and enteral feeding with a focus on critically ill patients. Recent Findings: Enteral feeding continues to serve as the mainstay for nutritional support in critically ill patients and is favored over parenteral nutrition, though recent trials suggest no substantial difference in outcomes between the two methods. Radiologic and endoscopic guidance remain the most common methods for enteral access. Additionally, recent advancements in enteral access technique and trials on best practices for timing and composition of nutritional support in critically ill patients continue to reduce complications, improve outcomes, and reduce cost. Summary: Nutritional support improves outcomes in critically ill patients, and the safe and durable establishment of enteral access is an important component in the care of these patients. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG.

引用

页码：190 / 195

页数：5

共 42 条

[1]

Arabi Y.M., Aldawood A.S., Haddad S.H., Et al., Permissive underfeeding or standard enteral feeding in critically ill adults, N Engl J Med, 372, pp. 2398-2408, (2015)

[2]

Martindale R.G., McClave S.A., Vanek V.W., Et al., Guidelines for the provision and assessment of nutrition support therapy in the adult critically ill patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Executive Summary, Crit Care Med, 37, pp. 1757-1761, (2009)

[3]

Norman K., Pichard C., Lochs H., Pirlich M., Prognostic impact of disease-related malnutrition, Clin Nutr, 27, pp. 5-15, (2008)

[4]

Harvey S.E., Parrott F., Harrison D.A., Et al., Trial of the route of early nutritional support in critically ill adults, N Engl J Med, 371, pp. 1673-1684, (2014)

[5]

Elke G., van Zanten A.R.H., Lemieux M., McCall M., Jeejeebhoy K.N., Kott M., Et al., Enteral versus parenteral nutrition in critically ill patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Crit Care, pp. 1-14, (2016)

[6]

Seres D.S., Valcarcel M., Guillaume A., Advantages of enteral nutrition over parenteral nutrition, Therap Adv Gastroenterol, 6, pp. 157-167, (2013)

[7]

Yarmus L., Gilbert C., Lechtzin N., Imad M., Ernst A., Feller-Kopman D., Safety and feasibility of interventional pulmonologists performing bedside percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement, Chest, 144, pp. 436-440, (2013)

[8]

Gomes C.A.R., Andriolo R.B., Bennett C., Lustosa S.A.S., Matos D., Waisberg D.R., Et al., Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy versus nasogastric tube feeding for adults with swallowing disturbances, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (2015)

[9]

Alkhawaja S., CD008875, Recent systematic review with meta-analysis evaluating outcomes from gastric versus post-pyloric feeding in critically ill patients, (2015)

[10]

Adam M.D., Rupinder D., Andrew G.D., Emma J.R., Andrew R.D., Daren K.H., Comparisons between intragastric and small intestinal delivery of enteral nutrition in the critically ill: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Crit Care, 17, (2013)

← 1 2 3 4 5 →