Comment on Tothill and Hannan: precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

被引:0
作者
G. Phillipov
C. J. Seaborn
机构
[1] The Queen Elizabeth Hospital,Department of Endocrinology
来源
Osteoporosis International | 2008年 / 19卷
关键词
Bone Mineral Density; Hydroxyapatite; Primary Care Practitioner; Reliable Analytical Method; Logical Option;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:1099 / 1100
页数:1
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Tothill P(2007)Precision and accuracy of measuring changes in bone mineral density by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry Osteoporos Int 18 1515-1523
[2]  
Hannan WJ(2003)Is the paradigm shifting Bone 33 457-465
[3]  
Heaney RP(2004)Statistical validation of surrogate endpoints: is bone density a valid surrogate for fracture J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 4 64-74
[4]  
Li Z(2007)Bone quality: an empty term PLoS Med 4 e27-1578
[5]  
Chines AA(1999)Multinuclear solid-state three-dimensional MRI of bone and synthetic calcium phosphates PNAS 96 1574-1905
[6]  
Meredith MP(1997)Comparative calibration without a gold standard Stat Med 16 1889-183
[7]  
Sievänen H(2000)The fallacy of BMD: a critical review of the diagnostic use of dual X-ray absorptiometry Clin Rheumatol 19 174-154
[8]  
Kannus P(2007)DXA in vivo BMD methodology: an erroneous and misleading research and clinical gauge of bone mineral status, bone fragility, and bone remodelling Bone 41 138-119
[9]  
Järvinen TL(2007)A review of strontium ranelate and its effect on DXA scans J Clin Densitom 10 113-941
[10]  
Wu Y(2007)Timing of peak bone mass: discrepancies between CT and DXA J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92 938-64