The da Vinci robotic surgery system for the management of endometrial cancer: a single-center experience

被引:0
|
作者
Latifah, Hassan M. [1 ]
Khan, Mahmoud Anis [1 ]
Nadreen, Farah [1 ]
Latifah, Abdullah [2 ]
Asaad, Alanoud [2 ]
Baradwan, Saeed [1 ]
机构
[1] King Faisal Specialist Hosp & Res Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
[2] Alfaisal Univ, Coll Med, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Endometrial cancer; Hysterectomy; da Vinci; Robotic surgery; HYSTERECTOMY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-024-01845-6
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this study was to report our single-center experience of the da Vinci robotic surgery system in the management of endometrial cancer (EC) patients during 2019-2023. We descriptively summarized the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes. Moreover, we conducted subgroup analyses based on obesity (BMI >= 30 kg/m(2)) and the intraoperative use of indocyanine green dye (ICG). Overall, 100 patients were analyzed. Eighty-five patients (85%) were obese. The mean operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) were 240.84 +/- 70.08 min (range: 110-720) and 104.2 +/- 80.3 ml (range: 20-500), respectively. The mean number of retrieved pelvic LNs was 3.01 +/- 3.06 (range: 0-15). The use of ICG was employed in 58 (58%). Only a single patient (1%) underwent conversion to laparotomy. Besides, only three (3%) patients experienced vaginal laceration intraoperatively, respectively. The mean hospital stay was 1.34 +/- 0.69 days (range: 1-5). No patient experienced postoperative complications. Most tumors had endometrioid histology (82%), grade-1 tumor (49%), and stage-1A disease (67%). At 3-year follow-up, only two patients (2%) developed recurrence. Patients who received the ICG had significantly lower operative time (225.86 vs. 261.52 min, p = 0.011), estimated blood loss (90 vs. 123.81 ml, p = 0.037), and hospital stay (1.12 vs. 1.64 days, p < 0.001) compared with patients who did not receive it. However, there was no significant difference between both groups regarding the number of retrieved pelvic LNs. Obesity had no significant impact on the rates of intraoperative complications, postoperative complications, and 3-year recurrence incidence. In conclusion, robotic surgery was technically feasible and safe. The use of ICG was statistically linked to favorable outcomes, in terms of decreased operative time, EBL, and hospital stay. Obesity did not impact the perioperative surgical outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Da Vinci Robotic Surgical System: Early Experience from Pakistan
    Qureshi, Harris Hassan
    Mohsin, Rehan
    Mahar, Naveed Ahmed
    Laghari, Riaz Ahmed
    Hussain, Mushtaq
    Hashmi, Altaf
    JCPSP-JOURNAL OF THE COLLEGE OF PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS PAKISTAN, 2024, 34 (04): : 489 - 493
  • [22] Load evaluation of the da Vinci surgical system for transoral robotic surgery
    Fujiwara K.
    Fukuhara T.
    Niimi K.
    Sato T.
    Kitano H.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2015, 9 (4) : 315 - 319
  • [23] Feasibility study of intraocular robotic surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System
    Bourla, Dan H.
    Hubschman, Jean Pierre
    Culjat, Martin
    Tsirbas, Angelo
    Gupta, Anurag
    Schwartz, Steven D.
    RETINA-THE JOURNAL OF RETINAL AND VITREOUS DISEASES, 2008, 28 (01): : 154 - 158
  • [24] Initial experience with robotic technology for thoracic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system in Tibet, China
    Ping, Ni
    Baoguo, Zhou
    Renqing, Zhaxi
    Shaodong, Wang
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [25] Early clinical experience with the da Vinci Xi Surgical System in general surgery
    Hagen M.E.
    Jung M.K.
    Ris F.
    Fakhro J.
    Buchs N.C.
    Buehler L.
    Morel P.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2017, 11 (3) : 347 - 353
  • [26] Robotic laparoendoscopic single-site benign gynecologic surgery: a single-center experience
    Jayakumaran J.
    Wiercinski K.
    Buffington C.
    Caceres A.
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2018, 12 (3) : 447 - 454
  • [27] Robotic colorectal surgery using the Senhance® robotic system: a single center experience
    N. E. Samalavicius
    A. Dulskas
    V. Janusonis
    V. Klimasauskiene
    V. Eismontas
    O. Deduchovas
    T. Janusonis
    R. Markelis
    E. Smolskas
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2022, 26 : 437 - 442
  • [28] Robotic colorectal surgery using the Senhance® robotic system: a single center experience
    Samalavicius, N. E.
    Dulskas, A.
    Janusonis, V
    Klimasauskiene, V
    Eismontas, V
    Deduchovas, O.
    Janusonis, T.
    Markelis, R.
    Smolskas, E.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2022, 26 (06) : 437 - 442
  • [29] The Management of Scar Ectopic: A Single-Center Experience
    Agarwal, Neha
    Gainder, Shalini
    Chopra, Seema
    Rohilla, Minakshi
    Prasad, G. R., V
    Jain, Vanita
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (06)
  • [30] Comparison of Surgical Outcomes between Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery and Da Vinci Single-Port Robotic Surgery
    Kim, Jeong-Min
    Lee, Seon-Mi
    Seol, Aeran
    Song, Jae-Yun
    Ryu, Ki-Jin
    Lee, Sanghoon
    Park, Hyun-Tae
    Cho, Hyun-Woong
    Min, Kyung-Jin
    Hong, Jin-Hwa
    Lee, Jae-Kwan
    Lee, Nak-Woo
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (02):