Evaluation of the performance of existing non-laboratory based cardiovascular risk assessment algorithms

[1] Mendis S(2011)Total cardiovascular risk approach to improve efficiency of cardiovascular prevention in resource constrain settings J Clin Epidemiol 64 1451-1462

[2] Lindholm LH(2004)Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case–control study Lancet 364 937-952

[3] Anderson SG(2008)WHO’s budgetary allocations and burden of disease: A comparative analysis Lancet 372 1563-1569

[4] Alwan A(2009)Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A review for clinicians J Am Coll Cardiol 54 1209-1227

[5] Koju R(2011)A life course approach to cardiovascular disease prevention J Cardiovasc Nurs 26 S22-S34

[6] Onwubere BJ(2010)Cardiovascular risk prediction: Basic concepts, current status, and future directions Circulation 121 1768-1777

[7] Kayani AM(2008)Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based method for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk: The NHANES I follow-up study cohort Lancet 371 923-931

[8] Abeysinghe N(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement Open Med 3 e123-e130

[9] Duneas A(2008)General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Framingham heart study Circulation 117 743-753

[10] Tabagari S(2011)A comparative assessment of non-laboratory-based versus commonly used laboratory-based cardiovascular disease risk scores in the NHANES III population PLoS One 6 e20416-1582

[1] Mendis S(2011)Total cardiovascular risk approach to improve efficiency of cardiovascular prevention in resource constrain settings J Clin Epidemiol 64 1451-1462

[2] Lindholm LH(2004)Effect of potentially modifiable risk factors associated with myocardial infarction in 52 countries (the INTERHEART study): Case–control study Lancet 364 937-952

[3] Anderson SG(2008)WHO’s budgetary allocations and burden of disease: A comparative analysis Lancet 372 1563-1569

[4] Alwan A(2009)Value and limitations of existing scores for the assessment of cardiovascular risk: A review for clinicians J Am Coll Cardiol 54 1209-1227

[5] Koju R(2011)A life course approach to cardiovascular disease prevention J Cardiovasc Nurs 26 S22-S34

[6] Onwubere BJ(2010)Cardiovascular risk prediction: Basic concepts, current status, and future directions Circulation 121 1768-1777

[7] Kayani AM(2008)Laboratory-based versus non-laboratory-based method for assessment of cardiovascular disease risk: The NHANES I follow-up study cohort Lancet 371 923-931

[8] Abeysinghe N(2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement Open Med 3 e123-e130

[9] Duneas A(2008)General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care: The Framingham heart study Circulation 117 743-753

[10] Tabagari S(2011)A comparative assessment of non-laboratory-based versus commonly used laboratory-based cardiovascular disease risk scores in the NHANES III population PLoS One 6 e20416-1582