Support vector machine for structural reliability analysis

被引:0
作者
Hong-shuang Li
Zhen-zhou Lü
Zhu-feng Yue
机构
[1] Northwestern Polytechnical University,School of Aeronautics
来源
Applied Mathematics and Mechanics | 2006年 / 27卷
关键词
structural reliability; implicit performance function; support vector machine; TB114.3; 62N05; 90B25;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Support vector machine (SVM) was introduced to analyze the reliability of the implicit performance function, which is difficult to implement by the classical methods such as the first order reliability method (FORM) and the Monte Carlo simulation (MCS). As a classification method where the underlying structural risk minimization inference rule is employed, SVM possesses excellent learning capacity with a small amount of information and good capability of generalization over the complete data. Hence, two approaches, i.e., SVM-based FORM and SVM-based MCS, were presented for the structural reliability analysis of the implicit limit state function. Compared to the conventional response surface method (RSM) and the artificial neural network (ANN), which are widely used to replace the implicit state function for alleviating the computation cost, the more important advantages of SVM are that it can approximate the implicit function with higher precision and better generalization under the small amount of information and avoid the “curse of dimensionality”. The SVM-based reliability approaches can approximate the actual performance function over the complete sampling data with the decreased number of the implicit performance function analysis (usually finite element analysis), and the computational precision can satisfy the engineering requirement, which are demonstrated by illustrations.
引用
收藏
页码:1295 / 1303
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Gomes H. M.(2004)Comparison of the response surface and neural network with other methods for structural reliability analysis[J] Structural Safety 26 49-67
[2]  
Awruch A. M.(2005)Benefit of splines and neural networks in simulation based structural reliability analysis[J] Structural Safety 27 246-261
[3]  
Schueremans L.(2001)Reliability analysis—a review and some perspectives[J] Structural Safety 23 365-395
[4]  
Gemert D. V.(1999)A general procedure for first/second-order reliability method (FORM/SORM)[J] Structral Safety 21 95-112
[5]  
Rackwitz R.(2004)An examination of methods for approximating implicit limit state functions from the viewpoint of statistical learning theory[J] Structural Safety 26 271-293
[6]  
Zhao Y. G.(1990)A fast and efficient response surface approach for structural reliability problems[J] Structural Safety 7 57-66
[7]  
Ono T.(1993)A new look at the response surface approach for reliability analysis[J] Structural Safety 12 205-220
[8]  
Hurtado J. E.(1997)Response surface method using vector projected sampling points[J] Structural Safety 19 3-19
[9]  
Bucher C. G.(2001)Effect of response surface parameter variation on structural reliability estimates[J] Structural Safety 23 429-444
[10]  
Bourgund U.(2001)Neural-network-based reliability analysis: a comparative study[J] Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 191 113-132