Risk communication and sustainability science: lessons from the field

被引:0
作者
Laura Lindenfeld
Hollie M. Smith
Todd Norton
Natalie C. Grecu
机构
[1] University of Maine,Department of Communication and Journalism, The Margaret Chase Smith Policy Center, Maine’s Sustainability Solutions Initiative
[2] Washington State University,Edward R. Murrow College of Communication
来源
Sustainability Science | 2014年 / 9卷
关键词
Sustainability science; Risk communication; Mental models; Transdisciplinarity; Communication theory; Uncertainty;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Sustainability science aims to help societies across the globe address the increased environmental and health crises and risks that range from poverty to climate change to health pandemics. With the increased magnitude and frequency of these large-scale risks to different societies, scientists and institutions have increasingly recognized the need for improved communication and collaboration among researchers, governments, businesses, and communities. This article argues that risk communication has fundamentally important contributions to make to sustainability science’s mission to create use-inspired, “actionable science” that can lead to solutions. Risk communication research can advance the mission of sustainability science to engage a wide range of stakeholders. This kind of engagement is especially important in the context of addressing sustainability problems that are characterized by high levels of uncertainty and complexity. We introduce three core tenets of risk communication research that are fundamental to advancing sustainability science. Risk communication specifically offers an increased understanding of how system feedbacks, human perceptions, and levels of uncertainty influence the study and design of solutions within social ecological systems.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 127
页数:8
相关论文
共 137 条
  • [1] Aeberhard A(2009)Transdisciplinary co-production of knowledge in the development of organic agriculture in Switzerland Ecol Econ 68 1171-1181
  • [2] Rist S(2007)Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature Proc Natl Acad Sci 104 13868-13874
  • [3] Bang M(2009)Speaking of risk: matters of context Environ Commun 3 335-354
  • [4] Medin DL(2001)Communication and uncertainty management J Commun 51 477-192
  • [5] Atran S(2006)Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world Ecol Soc 11 181-494
  • [6] Boholm Å(2006)Countering the loading-dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems Sci Technol Human Values 31 465-357
  • [7] Brashers DE(2003)Sustainability science: the emerging research program Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100 8059-20
  • [8] Cash DW(2011)An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social ecological research Front Ecol Environ 9 351-1254
  • [9] Adger WN(2007)Nature’s “crisis disciplines”: does environmental communication have an ethical duty? Environ Commun 1 5-23
  • [10] Berkes F(2003)Organizational learning mechanisms and managers, perceived uncertainty Human Relat 56 1233-333