Stakeholders’ Role and Actions in the Return-to-Work Process of Workers on Sick-Leave Due to Common Mental Disorders: A Scoping Review

被引:0
作者
Marc Corbière
Maud Mazaniello-Chézol
Marie-France Bastien
Estelle Wathieu
Roxane Bouchard
Alexandra Panaccio
Stéphane Guay
Tania Lecomte
机构
[1] Université du Québec à Montréal,Department of Education, Career counselling
[2] Centre de recherche de l’Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal (CR-IUSMM),Department of Family Medicine
[3] McGill University,Department of Psychology
[4] Université du Québec à Montréal,Department of Art History
[5] Concordia University,John Molson School of Business
[6] CIUSSS de l’Est-de-l’Île-de-Montréal,Department of Psychiatry and Addictology
[7] Concordia University,Department of Psychology
[8] Université de Montreal,undefined
[9] Université de Montréal,undefined
来源
Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation | 2020年 / 30卷
关键词
Return to work; Common mental disorder; Stakeholder; Role; Action; System; Scoping review;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The lack of knowledge regarding the roles and actions of return to work (RTW) stakeholders create confusion and uncertainty about how and when to RTW after experiencing a common mental disorder (CMD). Purpose The purpose of this scoping review is to disentangle the various stakeholders’ role and actions in the RTW process of workers on sick-leave due to CMDs. The research question is: What is documented in the existing literature regarding the roles and actions of the identified stakeholders involved in the RTW process of workers on sick-leave due to CMDs? Methods In conducting this scoping review, we followed Arksey and O’Malley’s (Int J Soc Res Methodol 8:19–32, 2005) methodology, consisting of different stages (e.g., charting the data by categorizing key results). Results 3709 articles were screened for inclusion, 243 of which were included for qualitative synthesis. Several RTW stakeholders (n=11) were identified (e.g., workers on sick leave due to CMDs, managers, union representatives, rehabilitation professionals, insurers, return to work coordinators). RTW stakeholders’ roles and actions inter- and intra-system were recommended, either general (e.g., know and understand the perspectives of all RTW stakeholders) or specific to an actor (e.g., the return to work coordinator needs to create and maintain a working alliance between all RTW stakeholders). Furthermore, close to 200 stakeholders’ actions, spread out on different RTW phases, were recommended for facilitating the RTW process. Conclusions Eleven RTW stakeholders from the work, heath and insurance systems have been identified, as well as their respective roles and actions. Thanks to these results, RTW stakeholders and policy makers will be able to build practical relationships and collaboration regarding the RTW of workers on sick leave due to CMDs.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 419
页数:38
相关论文
共 1026 条
[1]  
Claudi Jensen AG(2013)Towards a parsimonious program theory of return to work intervention Work Read Mass 44 155-164
[2]  
Claudi Jensen AG(2013)A two-year follow-up on a program theory of return to work intervention Work Read Mass 44 165-175
[3]  
Joyce S(2016)Workplace interventions for common mental disorders: a systematic meta-review Psychol Med 46 683-697
[4]  
Modini M(2013)Effects of a multidisciplinary stress treatment programme on patient return to work rate and symptom reduction: results from a randomised, wait-list controlled trial Psychother Psychosom 82 177-186
[5]  
Christensen H(2009)Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of an exposure-based return-to-work programme for patients on sick leave due to common mental disorders: design of a cluster-randomized controlled trial BMC Public Health 9 140-3274
[6]  
Mykletun A(2016)Protocol for the at work trial: a randomised controlled trial of a workplace intervention targeting subjective health complaints BMC Public Health 16 844-60
[7]  
Bryant R(2012)Predictors of recurrent sickness absence due to depressive disorders—a Delphi approach involving scientists and physicians PLoS ONE 8 12-643
[8]  
Mitchell PB(2008)Cost-effectiveness of a workplace intervention for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: design of a randomized controlled trial BMC Public Health 46 3263-38
[9]  
Harvey SB(2016)Interventions for enhancing return to work in individuals with a common mental illness: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Psychol Med 130 59-322
[10]  
Netterstrom B(2010)Common mental health problems and work: applying evidence to inform practice Perspect Public Health 17 629-52