Environmental Subsidiarity as a Guiding Principle for Forestry Governance: Application to Payment for Ecosystem Services and REDD+ Architecture

被引:1
作者
Pablo Martinez de Anguita
Maria Ángeles Martín
Abbie Clare
机构
[1] Universidad Rey Juan Carlos,Departamental II
[2] Edinburgh University,School of Geosciences
来源
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics | 2014年 / 27卷
关键词
Environmental subsidiarity; REDD+; Decentralization; Forest governance; Community; Education; Participation; Payment for ecosystem services;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This article describes and proposes the “environmental subsidiarity principle” as a guiding ethical value in forestry governance. Different trends in environmental management such as local participation, decentralization or global governance have emerged in the last two decades at the global, national and local level. This article suggests that the conscious or unconscious application of subsidiarity has been the ruling principle that has allocated the level at which tasks have been assigned to different agents. Based on this hypothesis this paper describes the principle of subsidiarity and its application to environmental policies within forest governance and proposes the “environmental subsidiarity” principle as a critical conceptual tool for sustainable resource management. The paper explains as an example how “environmental subsidiarity” is the key principle that can link payment for ecosystem services (PES) with environmental public policies and applies this principle with all its political consequences to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation, and enhancing forest carbon stocks in developing countries (REDD+) architecture. It concludes by showing how the adoption of “environmental subsidiarity” as a ethical principle could help to maximize benefits to all stakeholders involved in PES schemes such as REDD+.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 631
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Agrawal A(2001)The regulatory community: Decentralization and the environment in the Van Panchayats (Forest Councils) of Kumaon, India Mountain Research and Development 21 208-211
  • [2] Agrawal A(1999)Accountability in decentralization: A framework with South Asian and African cases Journal of Developing Areas 33 473-502
  • [3] Ribot J(1994)Taking subsidiarity seriously: Federalism in the European community and the United States Columbia Law Review 94 332-336
  • [4] Bermann GA(2000)Understanding public participation in forest planning: A review Forest Policy and Economics 1 15-25
  • [5] Buchy M(2003)Subsidiarity as a structural principle of international human rights law American Journal of International Law 97 38-79
  • [6] Hoverman S(2003)Decentralisation and poverty reduction in Africa: The politics of local-central relations Public Administration and Development 23 77-88
  • [7] Carozza P(2011)Community forest monitoring in REDD+: The ‘M’ in MRV? Environmental Science & Policy 14 181-187
  • [8] Crook RC(2003)Retrospective and prospective view of community Journal of Forest and Livelihood 2 5-7
  • [9] Fry BP(2003)Decentralization and forest management in Latin America: Towards a working model Public Administration and Development 23 211-226
  • [10] Gilmour D(2011)Hacia un sistema público-privado de pago por servicios ecosistémicos en España Spanish Journal of Rural Development 2 101-114