Clinical outcomes in patients with acute hemodynamic collapse supported by extracorporeal life support

被引:0
作者
Toshiharu Fujii
Hirofumi Nagamatsu
Masataka Nakano
Yohei Ohno
Gaku Nakazawa
Norihiko Shinozaki
Fuminobu Yoshimachi
Yuji Ikari
机构
[1] Tokai University School of Medicine,Division of Cardiology
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2017年 / 12卷
关键词
Extracorporeal life support; Cardiopulmonary arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Mortality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is utilized for acute hemodynamic collapse, clinical outcomes for such patients are uncertain. The present study examined 30-day clinical outcomes in patients treated with ECLS for acute hemodynamic collapse, and determined the factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients who required ECLS for cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). A total of 200 patients, in whom emergency ECLS was utilized for acute hemodynamic collapse from 2006 to 2015, were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of CPA on all-cause 30-day death in the overall population was examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis; comparisons were made between 30-day survivors (n = 78) and non-survivors (n = 122). In addition, clinical factors associated with 30-day survival for patients in whom ECLS was utilized for CPA (n = 139) were examined. All-cause 30-day mortality in the overall study population was 61 % (122/200). CPA was the most common cause of ECLS requirement (70 %), and the factor associated strongest with death at 30-days (OR 3.31, 95 % CI 1.75–6.36, P < 0.01). Witnessed CPA with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 4.33, 95 % CI 1.08–29.1, P = 0.04) and a less than 40 min interval between CPA and ECLS (OR 3.49, 95 % CI 1.39–9.02, P < 0.01) were suggested as factors associated with 30-day survival in CPA patients. CPA as a trigger of ECLS was a strong contributor to 30-day death in patients in whom emergency ECLS was utilized. However, witnessed CPA with bystander CPR and a less than 40 min interval from CPA to start of ECLS were suggested as factors associated with survival in these CPA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1214
页数:7
相关论文
共 281 条
[21]  
Stiell IG(2004)Cardiac arrest care and emergency medical services in Canada Can J Cardiol 20 1081-1090
[22]  
Laupacis A(1990)Cardiac arrest and resuscitation: a tale of 29 cities Ann Emerg Med 19 179-186
[23]  
Pham B(2013)Extracorporeal life support Curr Opin Crit Care 19 202-207
[24]  
De Maio VJ(2011)Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a review of the Japanese literature Resuscitation 82 10-14
[25]  
Wells GA(2008)Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with assisted extracorporeal life-support versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study and propensity analysis Lancet 372 554-561
[26]  
Rewers M(2015)Part 4: advanced life support: 2015 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations Resuscitation 95 e71-e120
[27]  
Tilgreen RE(2009)Guidelines for indications for the use of extracorporeal life support in refractory cardiac arrest. French Ministry of Health Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 28 182-190
[28]  
Crawford ME(2014)An optimal transition time to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for predicting good neurological outcome in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a propensity-matched study Crit Care 18 535-85
[29]  
Hjortso N(2010)Early induction of hypothermia during cardiac arrest improves neurological outcomes in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who undergo emergency cardiopulmonary bypass and percutaneous coronary intervention Circ J 74 77-669
[30]  
Grmec S(2013)Door-to-implantation time of extracorporeal life support systems predicts mortality in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Clin Res Cardiol 102 661-2072