Clinical outcomes in patients with acute hemodynamic collapse supported by extracorporeal life support

被引:0
作者
Toshiharu Fujii
Hirofumi Nagamatsu
Masataka Nakano
Yohei Ohno
Gaku Nakazawa
Norihiko Shinozaki
Fuminobu Yoshimachi
Yuji Ikari
机构
[1] Tokai University School of Medicine,Division of Cardiology
来源
Internal and Emergency Medicine | 2017年 / 12卷
关键词
Extracorporeal life support; Cardiopulmonary arrest; Cardiopulmonary resuscitation; Mortality;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although extracorporeal life support (ECLS) is utilized for acute hemodynamic collapse, clinical outcomes for such patients are uncertain. The present study examined 30-day clinical outcomes in patients treated with ECLS for acute hemodynamic collapse, and determined the factors associated with 30-day mortality in patients who required ECLS for cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA). A total of 200 patients, in whom emergency ECLS was utilized for acute hemodynamic collapse from 2006 to 2015, were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of CPA on all-cause 30-day death in the overall population was examined by multivariable logistic regression analysis; comparisons were made between 30-day survivors (n = 78) and non-survivors (n = 122). In addition, clinical factors associated with 30-day survival for patients in whom ECLS was utilized for CPA (n = 139) were examined. All-cause 30-day mortality in the overall study population was 61 % (122/200). CPA was the most common cause of ECLS requirement (70 %), and the factor associated strongest with death at 30-days (OR 3.31, 95 % CI 1.75–6.36, P < 0.01). Witnessed CPA with bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) (OR 4.33, 95 % CI 1.08–29.1, P = 0.04) and a less than 40 min interval between CPA and ECLS (OR 3.49, 95 % CI 1.39–9.02, P < 0.01) were suggested as factors associated with 30-day survival in CPA patients. CPA as a trigger of ECLS was a strong contributor to 30-day death in patients in whom emergency ECLS was utilized. However, witnessed CPA with bystander CPR and a less than 40 min interval from CPA to start of ECLS were suggested as factors associated with survival in these CPA patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1214
页数:7
相关论文
共 281 条
[1]  
Phillips SJ(1983)Percutaneous initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass Ann Thorac Surg 36 223-225
[2]  
Ballentine B(2014)Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a prospective observational study Resuscitation 85 762-768
[3]  
Slonine D(1999)A cumulative meta-analysis of the effectiveness of defibrillator-capable emergency medical services for victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest Ann Emerg Med 34 517-525
[4]  
Hall J(2000)One-year survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Copenhagen according to the ‘Utstein style’ Resuscitation 47 137-146
[5]  
Vandehaar J(2003)Does the Mainz Emergency Evaluation Scoring (MEES) in combination with capnometry (MEESc) help in the prognosis of outcome from cardiopulmonary resuscitation in a prehospital setting? Resuscitation 58 89-96
[6]  
Kongtahworn C(2015)Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest N Engl J Med 372 2307-2315
[7]  
Zeff RH(2010)Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Circulation 122 S685-S705
[8]  
Skinner JR(2010)Part 7: CPR techniques and devices: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Circulation 122 S720-S728
[9]  
Reckmo K(2014)Public health burden of sudden cardiac death in the US Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 7 212-217
[10]  
Gray D(2016)Heart disease and stroke statistics—2016 update: a report from the American Heart Association Circulation 133 e38-e60