Loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mutations have profoundly different effects on protein structure

被引:0
作者
Lukas Gerasimavicius
Benjamin J. Livesey
Joseph A. Marsh
机构
[1] University of Edinburgh,MRC Human Genetics Unit, Institute of Genetics & Cancer
来源
Nature Communications | / 13卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Most known pathogenic mutations occur in protein-coding regions of DNA and change the way proteins are made. Taking protein structure into account has therefore provided great insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying human genetic disease. While there has been much focus on how mutations can disrupt protein structure and thus cause a loss of function (LOF), alternative mechanisms, specifically dominant-negative (DN) and gain-of-function (GOF) effects, are less understood. Here, we investigate the protein-level effects of pathogenic missense mutations associated with different molecular mechanisms. We observe striking differences between recessive vs dominant, and LOF vs non-LOF mutations, with dominant, non-LOF disease mutations having much milder effects on protein structure, and DN mutations being highly enriched at protein interfaces. We also find that nearly all computational variant effect predictors, even those based solely on sequence conservation, underperform on non-LOF mutations. However, we do show that non-LOF mutations could potentially be identified by their tendency to cluster in three-dimensional space. Overall, our work suggests that many pathogenic mutations that act via DN and GOF mechanisms are likely being missed by current variant prioritisation strategies, but that there is considerable scope to improve computational predictions through consideration of molecular disease mechanisms.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 164 条
[1]  
Stenson PD(2017)The Human Gene Mutation Database: towards a comprehensive repository of inherited mutation data for medical research, genetic diagnosis and next-generation sequencing studies Hum. Genet. 136 665-677
[2]  
Landrum MJ(2014)ClinVar: Public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype Nucleic Acids Res 42 980-985
[3]  
Karczewski KJ(2020)The mutational constraint spectrum quantified from variation in 141,456 humans Nature 581 434-443
[4]  
Miosge LA(2015)Comparison of predicted and actual consequences of missense mutations Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112 E5189-E5198
[5]  
Livesey BJ(2020)Using deep mutational scanning to benchmark variant effect predictors and identify disease mutations Mol. Syst. Biol. 16 1-12
[6]  
Marsh JA(2015)Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: A joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology Genet. Med. 17 405-424
[7]  
Richards S(2018)Quantitative missense variant effect prediction using large-scale mutagenesis data Cell Syst. 6 116-124.e3
[8]  
Gray VE(2020)Limitations and challenges in protein stability prediction upon genome variations: towards future applications in precision medicine Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 18 1968-1979
[9]  
Hause RJ(2019)Gain-of-function DNMT3A mutations cause microcephalic dwarfism and hypermethylation of Polycomb-regulated regions Nat. Genet. 51 96-105
[10]  
Luebeck J(2019)De novo missense variants in FBXW11 cause diverse developmental phenotypes including brain, eye, and digit anomalies. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105 640-657