Towards a socially fair green transition in the EU? An analysis of the Just Transition Fund using the Multiple Streams Framework

被引:0
作者
Anna Kyriazi
Joan Miró
机构
[1] Università degli Studi di Milano,Department of Social and Political Sciences
来源
Comparative European Politics | 2023年 / 21卷
关键词
Just transition; European Green Deal; Multiple Streams Framework; Climate change; European Union;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The Just Transition Fund was introduced in 2021 as part of the European Union’s Green New Deal and aims to assuage some of the painful social consequences of the green transition. Relying on the Multiple Streams Framework, this article reconstructs the JTF’s institution. It identifies 2018–2019 as a key conjuncture in the European Union when various social, ideational and political preconditions enabling policy innovation converged. Subsequently, the need to publicly finance a just transition emerged in relation to some Eastern European states’ reluctance to work towards the 2050 climate neutrality target. After a Polish-led configuration of actors propelled the JTF onto the agenda, the von der Leyen Commission assumed the task of designing a less transparently self-serving policy instrument necessary to garner wider political support. The final JTF emerged from the interplay between two policy entrepreneurs in the context of the negotiations on the 2021–2027 European Union budget and the dislocations provoked by the COVID-19 crisis.
引用
收藏
页码:112 / 132
页数:20
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Ackrill R(2011)Multiple streams in EU policymaking: The case of the 2005 sugar reform Journal of European Public Policy 18 72-89
  • [2] Kay A(2020)The politics of the green new deal The Political Quarterly 91 770-779
  • [3] Bloomfield J(2020)The covid-19 crisis: A critical juncture for EU climate policy development? Journal of European Integration 42 1095-1110
  • [4] Steward F(1998)Predictable and unpredictable policy windows: Institutional and exogenous correlates of Canadian federal agenda-setting Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 495-524
  • [5] Dupont C(2019)Climate politics after the yellow vests Dissent 66 115-125
  • [6] Oberthür S(2020)Hypocrisy as a crisis response? Assessing changes in talk, decisions, and actions of the European Commission in EU Environmental Policy Public Administration 98 363-377
  • [7] von Homeyer I(2019)The French Insurgency: Political Economy of the Gilet Jaunes New Left Review 116 75-98
  • [8] Howlett M(2019)Changing the story? The discourse of ecological modernisation in the European Union Environmental Politics 28 208-227
  • [9] Kinniburgh C(2020)How did we do that? Histories and political economies of rapid and just transitions New Political Economy 26 907-922
  • [10] Knill C(2017)Assessing the European Union’s global climate change leadership: From Copenhagen to the Paris agreement Journal of European Integration 39 239-252