Robot-assisted hysterectomy for endometrial and cervical cancers: a systematic review

被引：26

作者：

Nevis I.F. ^{[1
]}

Vali B. ^{[1
]}

Higgins C. ^{[1
]}

Dhalla I. ^{[1
,2
]}

Urbach D. ^{[3
]}

Bernardini M.Q. ^{[4
]}

机构：

[1] Health Quality Ontario, 130 Bloor Street West, 10th Floor, Toronto, M5S 1N5, ON

[2] Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael’s Hospital, 30 Bond St, Toronto, M5B 1W8, ON

[3] Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, M5G 2M9, ON

[4] Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 610, University Avenue, Toronto, M5G 2M9, ON

来源：

Journal of Robotic Surgery | 2017年 / 11卷 / 1期

关键词：

Cervical cancer; Effectiveness; Endometrial cancer; Hysterectomy; Laparoscopy; Laparotomy; Robot assisted; Systematic review;

D O I：

10.1007/s11701-016-0621-9

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

Total and radical hysterectomies are the most common treatment strategies for early-stage endometrial and cervical cancers, respectively. Surgical modalities include open surgery, laparoscopy, and more recently, minimally invasive robot-assisted surgery. We searched several electronic databases for randomized controlled trials and observational studies with a comparison group, published between 2009 and 2014. Our outcomes of interest included both perioperative and morbidity outcomes. We included 35 observational studies in this review. We did not find any randomized controlled trials. The quality of evidence for all reported outcomes was very low. For women with endometrial cancer, we found that there was a reduction in estimated blood loss between the robot-assisted surgery compared to both laparoscopy and open surgery. There was a reduction in length of hospital stay between robot-assisted surgery and open surgery but not laparoscopy. There was no difference in total lymph node removal between the three modalities. There was no difference in the rate of overall complications between the robot-assisted technique and laparoscopy. For women with cervical cancer, there were no differences in estimated blood loss or removal of lymph nodes between robot-assisted and laparoscopic procedure. Compared to laparotomy, robot-assisted hysterectomy for cervical cancer showed an overall reduction in estimated blood loss. Although robot-assisted hysterectomy is clinically effective for the treatment of both endometrial and cervical cancers, methodologically rigorous studies are lacking to draw definitive conclusions. © 2016, Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada.

引用

页码：1 / 16

页数：15

共 71 条

[1]

Ferlay J., Steliarova-Foucher E., Lortet-Tieulent J., Rosso S., Coebergh J.W., Comber H., Forman D., Bray F., Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012, Eur J Cancer, 49, pp. 1374-1403, (2013)

[2]

Torre L.A., Bray F., Siegel R.L., Ferlay J., Lortet-Tieulent J., Jemal A., Global cancer statistics, 2012, CA: Cancer J Clin, 65, pp. 87-108, (2015)

[3]

Galaal K., Bryant A., Fisher A.D., Al-Khaduri M., Kew F., Lopes A.D., Laparoscopy versus laparotomy for the management of early stage endometrial cancer, Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 9, (2012)

[4]

Janda M., Gebski V., Brand A., Hogg R., Jobling T.W., Land R., Manolitsas T., McCartney A., Nascimento M., Neesham D., Nicklin J.L., Oehler M.K., Otton G., Perrin L., Salfinger S., Hammond I., Leung Y., Walsh T., Sykes P., Ngan H., Garrett A., Laney M., Ng T.Y., Tam K., Chan K., Wrede C.D., Pather S., Simcock B., Farrell R., Obermair A., Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial, Lancet Onc

[5]

Walker J.L., Piedmonte M.R., Spirtos N.M., Eisenkop S.M., Schlaerth J.B., Mannel R.S., Spiegel G., Barakat R., Pearl M.L., Sharma S.K., Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for comprehensive surgical staging of uterine cancer: Gynecologic Oncology Group Study LAP2, J Clin Oncol, 27, pp. 5331-5336, (2009)

[6]

Kroft J., Li Q., Saskin R., Elit L., Bernardini M.Q., Gien L.T., Trends over time in the use of laparoscopic hysterectomy for the treatment of endometrial cancer, Gynecol Oncol, 138, pp. 536-541, (2015)

[7]

Peplinski R., Past, present and future of the Da Vinci robot, (2006)

[8]

Herron D.M., Marohn M., Group S.-M.R.S.C., A consensus document on robotic surgery, Surg Endosc, 22, 2, pp. 313-325, (2008)

[9]

Mendivil A., Holloway R.W., Boggess J.F., Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective, Gynecol Oncol, 114, pp. S24-S31, (2009)

[10]

Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., Altman D.G., Group P., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement, Open Med, 3, pp. e123-e130, (2009)

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 →